Skip to main content

Microalgae cultivation and value-based products from wastewater: insights and applications

Abstract

Global water scarcity demands innovative wastewater treatment and nutrient recycling methods; wherein microalgae have emerged as a promising solution for efficiently treating wastewater, while yielding valuable biomass for a variety of products. In this context, current focus is based on key aspects involved, e.g. microalgal cultivation utilizing wastewater from diverse sources (industries, agriculture, aquaculture, domestic, urban wastes, etc.) and symbiotic relationships with microbes. It delves into understanding the formation of high-value products from microalgae-based wastewater and estimates the potential benefits of microalgae cultivation through quantitative data analysis. Despite its promising potential the commercialization of microalgae, is hindered by high cultivation cost. The recent emphasis is on phycoremediation of wastewater with simultaneous feedstock generation for biofuels and nutraceuticals, which redirects nutrients to microalgal biomass, offering a sustainable biorefinery approach. This review provides a novel synthesis with recent advancements in microalgae-based wastewater treatment and biorefinery processes, emphasizing new methodologies and integrated approaches that address key challenges and highlight potential for transformative impacts in sustainable resource management and bio-product development.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

There is a shortage of water resources existing in the world due to drastic population growth and rapid economic development [266]. Therefore, bioremediation of effluents has become a critical matter of concern across the globe. Wastewater is a byproduct of a variety of domestic, municipal, industrial discharge (Soyabean, brewery, tannery, textile, dairy, molasses, starch, slaughter, etc.) commercial, agricultural and aquaculture activities [34, 61, 165]. The presence of nitrogen, phosphorus (organic and inorganic), metal ions and chemical oxygen demand in wastewater is particularly of concern from an environmental standpoint and extensive research has been directed towards their removal [30, 106]. Conventional processes have contributed to environmental and wastewater purification, having limitations (greenhouse emissions, required high-energy and high-nutrient discharge) [9]. "To create a sustainable future and support the circular economy, waste should be converted into valuable resources for recycle/ reuse, rather than simply discard/discharge into the environment. Microalgae have a wide range of applications in wastewater treatment, including the efficient removal of all types of pollutants from water (bioremediation) [53, 71]. This is in addition to their ability to fix and effectively control carbon dioxide emissions, resulting in negative carbon emissions. An effective way for uptake of nutrients from wastewater is cultivation of microalgae, which additionally produce bio-products, biofuels and co-products [10, 23, 38, 175]. However, comprehensive review is needed on the recent updates on the existing strategies being employed for microalgal cultivation and value added products/byproducts to improve the knowledge for researchers, scientist, students, related companies and other sectors.

Many studies are performed in order to develop new and modified greener approaches for production of microalgal biomass, biofuels and microalgal based high-value products utilizing wastewater. Chlorellaspp. is widely used to treat municipal wastewater at different stages, including before and after primary settling and after the activated sludge tank. Further, some of the reports demonstrated utilization of microalgae in bioremediation of toxic metals [30, 48], carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus [237] and chemical oxygen demand [177] from the waste water. Zhang et al. [263] reported no effect in the growth ofChlorella pyrenoidosa grown in waste water from the soya bean production. However, bacteria coexisting with C. pyrenoidosaimproved the biodegradation of glucose, nitrogen, phosphorus and chemical oxygen demand and reduced the total lipid content in microalgae [263]. Some microalgae symbiotically associate with aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms to recover nutrients from wastewater [16, 106, 201]. There are studies showing complicated relationships between bacteria and microalgae during co-cultivation, which probably include mutualism and antagonism [72, 204].

Wastewater-cultivated microalgae produce hydrocarbons in bulk, which can be converted into biofuels such as biogas, biodiesel, bio-hydrogen, bioethanol and bio-butanol through thermochemical and biological methods [185]. Biofuel prepared by microalgae is also known as third generation biofuel [180], whereas pyrolysis of microalgae also produce co-products such as astaxanthin, carotenoids, phycocyanin, fatty acids, lectins and polysaccharides [134]. Despite the high cost of cultivation and processing, the production of biofuels along with integrated co-products is commercially beneficial from an industrial perspective [49]. Countries like China, Germany, Japan and Taiwan yearly yield approx. 19,000 tones of dehydrated microalgal biomass which produce an annual turnover of 5.7 billion USD by the derived high value products (HVPs) [94]. Various microalgae-based products, including antioxidants, fatty acids, pigments, polysaccharides, proteins, sterols and vitamins, are gaining market consolidation due to higher demand compared to dried biomass [232]. Some recently emerging biologically active compounds such as ꞵ-glucan, fucoxanthin, lutein, phycoerythrin and some polysaccharides needs further attention for effective uses and marketing [94]. We aim to (i) structure a systematic review on wastewater's ability to support microalgae biomass and pinpoint areas that require future advancements, and (ii) highlight recent updates on popular bio-products from wastewater-based microalgal biorefinery.

Microalgae

Microalgae encompass both prokaryotic blue-green algae commonly referred to as cyanobacteria (belonging to the Kingdom Monera and Division Cyanophyta), as well as eukaryotic diatoms and other microalgae (classified under the Kingdom Protista) which are photosynthetic, oxygen evolving, non-cohesive organism with polyphyletic origin [82, 117, 202]. Microalgae includes 72,500 species and 16 classes with both prokaryotic (blue green algae or cyanobacteria) and eukaryotic organism (diatoms, euglenoids and green algae) (Kang et al. [110]). Microalgae are found in varied forms such as, microscopic unicellular and multicellular [2]. According to Norton et al. [170], there are 200,000 to several million microalgal species on Earth, with 40,000 to 60,000 identified. Out of which, about fifteen strains of microalgal species are known to be cultivated for larger scale utilization in industry. Salinity is an important factor for the growth and development of microalgae [253]. Subdivisions in microalgae can be done on the basis of their salinity tolerance,Oligohaline (salinity tolerance: 0.5-5.0 gL-1), Mesohaline (salinity tolerance: 5.0-18.0 gL-1) and Euryhaline (salinity tolerance: 18.0-30.0 gL-1) [158, 160]. According to Oliveira et al. [174] marine algae can be classified as macroalgae consisting Rhodophyta (red algae), Chlorophyta (green algae), Phaeophyta (brown algae) and microalgae consisting Cyanophyta (blue-green algae), Pyrrophyta (dinoflagellates), Chrysophyta (diatoms and golden brown algae), Chlorophyta (microscopic green algae).

Microalgae have a unique chemical composition of extracellular and intracellular compounds e.g. lipids, proteins, pigments, carbohydrates, organic compounds, vitamins and minerals, etc. [35, 240]. These compounds in microalgae are responsible for the global interest and biomedical potential such as anti-allergic [62], anti-inflammatory [197], anti-bacterial [98], anti-tumoral [265], anti-viral [212], neuro-protective [63], and cardio-vascular protective [118]. Microalgae like cyanobacteria, diatoms, and green algae is considered as a new model organism for production of biofuel, biochemical, fertilizers, nutraceuticals, pharmaceutical, CO2bio-fixation and waste bioremediation [28, 155, 194].

Only few strains are used in industry, despite the huge number of microalgae species existing in nature [170], of which ~73,000 species have been isolated and published or are undergoing the process of being given names [74]. Spirulina and Chlorella are two of these rare algal strains that dominate the global microalgae industry for food linked to health and nutrition [115]. According to Borowitzka and Vonshak [28], the primary causes of the majority of strain’s failure to reach large-scale production is due to their poor productivity, slow growth rate, lack of robustness, or lack of value added from the biomass contributing to the high cost. Another explanation is the continued reliance on conventional technology in the commercial manufacturing of items obtained from microalgae. Hence, improved sustainable technology with optimized upstream and downstream processing is also required.

Recent updates and advances on microalgal cultivation in wastewater:

Wastewater is majorly released from sources like domestic, municipal, industrial discharge (soyabean, brewery, tannery, textile. molasses, starch, slaughter, commercial, agricultural and aquaculture activities) [61, 165]. The presence of nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals (elements with relative density > 4.5 kg/cm3, atomic weight 63.50-200.60) and chemical oxygen demand in wastewater is concerning [46]. Microalgal cultivation in wastewater is a novel environmental friendly strategy aimed at bolstering the circular economy for building a sustainable future. Instead of being thrown away, wastes could be transformed into useful resources. Cultivating microalgae utilizing wastewater, which also yield bio-products, biofuels and co-products, is an efficient method of obtaining nutrients from waste water [38, 175, 199] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Various applications of microalgal based products in industry

Microalgae are cultivated in open raceway ponds (OPRs) and closed photo -bioreactors (PBRs) [167]. Microalgal cultivation generally utilizes water, atmospheric carbon dioxide and a culture-rich medium with appropriate nutrients and salts [5, 18]. However, in many cases, the amount of water contributes significantly to the operational cost of microalgal cultivation, making the process more costly and energy-intensive. Culture conditions such as bioreactor conditioning, light, airflow, temperature, culture stirring, culture timing, pH are essential for generating the microalgal biomass [36, 78, 97]. Since, microalgae are photosynthetic organisms, increasing light intensity also increases the production ofC. vulgarisbiomass proteins, pigments and lipids in poultry wastewater [78]. Pigment development was influenced by air flow and correlated with the carbon source supplying the pigments [78]. Mixotrophic cultivation of microalgae in textile wastewater increased the biomass ofC. vulgaris, increase the fatty acid methyl ester content (FAME) and decrease the chemical oxygen demand (COD) as compared to the cultivation in photo-autotrophic and heterotrophic conditions [97].

Pretreatment of pollutants or dilution of wastewater is recommended before inoculating microalgae, as it can promote better growth of the microalgae. Cheng et al. [36], reported that pretreatment of swine wastewater using titanium oxide and intense pulse light (TiO2+IPL) increased the growth ofTribonema sp. and Synechocystissp. compared to microalgae grown without pretreatment. Javed et al. [97] reported that 50% dilution of the textile wastewater can increase the biomass ofChlorella vulgariswhich can be utilized further for biofuel production. Pan et al. [182] performed acid pretreatment for the wastewater from potato juice. Higher biomass yields ofHaematococcus pluvialis was obtained from the effluents of both pretreatments when compared to cultivation in standard culture media (control) of potato based wastewater.Under tropical conditions, Arthrospiraachieved 84-96% of NH4-N removal and 72-87% of P removal in outdoor raceway ponds. Furthermore, the removal of 82.19% COD and 60.92% Cr (VI) can be achieved in chromium-containing wastewater [139]. Markou et al. [144] described 73.18% COD removal, 91.19%, carbohydrate removal along with complete removal of phenols, phosphorus, and nitrates using olive oil mill wastewater. In terms of economy, a concentration of 25% complex wastewater is good for protein, and 50% for lipid and carbohydrate production [104]. Decolorization of colored wastewater resulted in an almost two-fold increase in growth rate and a 50% increase in biomass yield ofArthrospira.

Cultivation using carbon-rich wastewater arising from the sago starch industry improves the biomass productivity along with the crude protein, carbohydrate, and lipid content of the biomass [195] adapted a high rate algal pond system in this study and achieved 98%, 99.9% and 99.4% reduction in chemical oxygen demand, ammoniacal-nitrogen, and phosphate levels, respectively

Microalgae work in symbiotic association with both aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, to recover nutrients from wastewater. Maintaining pure microalgal cultures is very difficult when open reactors are used for mass cultivation. However, use of better quality of water, surrounding environment, and operational circumstances affect the composition of microalgal biomass [243]. Bacterial groups synthesize antibiotics, growth stimulants, micronutrients and siderophores that promote growth and protect microalgae from pathogenic microorganisms [204]. Bacteria often produce acyl-homoserine, dimethyl-L-sulfoniopropionate, lactone, nitrogen, symbiotic factors, virbioferrin, and vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamine), to support microalgal growth [162]. Several microalgal genera, such as Chlorella, Scenedesmus, Chlamydomonas and indigenous microalgal consortia, are thoroughly studied for bioremediation (shown in Table 1) and biorefinery processes due to their high waste tolerance and valuable byproducts. Similar mutualistic relationships between microalgae and bacteria have been observed in previous studies (He et al. [81]; , Su et al. [238]). Bacterial synergy withChlorella sorokinianaincreased the microalgae growth, lipid content and biodiesel production from the wastewater of brewery (He et al. [81]). Removal of antibiotics from wastewater before microalgal cultivation is also suggested by Michelon et al. [150] observing significant increase in the growth of microalgae with increased biomass and carbohydrate content in antibiotic less wastewater conditions as compared to antibiotic rich medium. Gutiérrez-Casiano et al. [78] reportedC. vulgaris grown in poultry waste water as an effective means to reduce the concentrations of nitrogen and organic matter, whereas, the bacteria in poultry wastewater reduced the nitrogen and organic matter, producing CO2, which the microalgae used as food and released dissolved oxygen. Xu et al. [261] reported that the symbiotic association ofC. vulgaris with the endophytic bacterium S395-2-Clonostachys rosea (microalgae-bacteria-fungi) performs best when mixed LED wavelengths of Red (5) and Blue (5) are used to remove CO2 and nutrients from algae without losing methane in aquaculture wastewater. This sets the promising stage for future symbionts cultivation in wastewater treatment.

Table 1 Recent updates on microalgae used for the treatment of different wastewater

Microalgal biomass has an efficiency of up to 100% utilization of wastewater [27]. It can also grow in acidic pH (4.0–5.0) environment and simultaneously be utilized for generating the biomass for high value products through biorefinery model [123]. The above mentioned processes are also helpful in industrialization of microalgae based high value product as it leads to high CAPEX and OPEX through microalgal treatment, particularly when combining biomass production with wastewater treatment systems. To improve the likelihood of industrializing microalgal-based treatments with biomass generation, this crucial point should be addressed in future research. Padri et al. [179] reported that after entering the stationary phase of total phosphorus (TP) removal in the monoculture ofC. vulgaris TISTR 8580, the addition of Aspergillus niger, F5 pellets showed a promising result with 70% adsorption efficiency for harvesting and enhancing the nutrient removal purposes from cassava wastewater by microalgal-fungal pellet application.

Michelon et al. [150] highlighted the efficiency of microalgae in bioremediation and simultaneous removal of antibiotics like tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlorotetracycline and doxycycline from swine wastewater. The study performed by Michelon et al. [149] onChlorella spp. opened new approach for the use of microalgae developed on wastewater against multidrug resistant pathogenic bacteria i.e. Staphylococcus hyicus and Streptococcus suis.

Recently, there has been interest in using renewable raw materials to prepare metal ions for reduction to nanoparticles (NPs) [226]. For greener synthesis of NPs, a variety of biological elements can be employed, including bacteria, actinomycetes, fungi, cyanobacteria, macro-algae, and plants. Green synthesis is preferred over chemical and physical methods due to its biocompatibility, cost-effectiveness, ease of handling and eco-friendliness. Microalgae and cyanobacteria are extensively used for the removal of heavy metals, the removal of dyes from industrial effluents, pollutant bioremediation and the synthesis of molecules of commercial significance [8]. Mansour et al. [143] recorded the potential of nanoparticles form ofArthrospira platensisin removing the pollutants from the textile dyeing industry wastewater. Mitra et al. [159] developed the strategies for upstream and downstream processing ofArthrospira biorefinery process for both high- and low-value products upon valorization.

Recent updates on value based products by microalgae grown in wastewater

According to the report of Oswald et al. [176], microalgae have been utilized for wastewater treatment for several decades. Additionally, the USDOE aquatic species programme has reported that combining wastewater treatment with microalgae-based biofuel and coproducts is a promising way to reduce the cost of producing diesel and other pharmaceuticals [228]. Utilization of wastewater - cultivated microalgae to produce a range of coproducts and bio-products has increased recently due to the growing popularity of the microalgal biotechnology and circular bio-economy [1, 33, 89]. Microalgae are a promising alternative because of their versatile biochemical composition, rapid growth rate and high tolerance to nutrients and salt stress [210]. This makes microalgae a potential feedstock for commercially important bio-based products, such as animal feed, chemicals, bioplastics, biochar, fertilizers, and biofuels [138, 188].

Microalgal biomass is a suitable feedstock for the biorefinery concept because, it can produce bioactive compounds that support a range of food, pharmaceuticals, chemicals and nutraceuticals, etc. [232]. The biorefinery concept is based on oil refineries, which can convert biomass into a range of high-value products [37, 64]. Numerous fields, including nutraceuticals (polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), carotenoids, vitamins, phytosterols, or polyphenols), can benefit from the by-products produced [129, 147]. For increasing the production of value based products and attain circular economy, strategy for cultivation of microalgae in wastewater is now widely used. However, complete use of biotechnological and molecular tools can also increase the production of value based products and thus, further study in these fields is suggested. Numerous genetic components and engineering tools, including promoters, gene vectors, selection markers and gene editors, have been made available for the modification of metabolic pathways in microalgae by the ongoing advancements in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology [73]. The swift advancement of CRISPR gene editing and Omics technologies has presented unparalleled prospects for the creation of modified microalgae strains exhibiting elevated pigment production [99].

Value based products were initially extracted from various sources such as animal, vegetables, plants or artificially synthesized [76]. The synthetic biomolecules are less effective and have many side effects [113]. Microalgae-based byproducts have a wide range of biological activities and industrial applications [45]. The primary and secondary metabolites of microalgae can be used as a feedstock for a variety of bio-products [245]. Proteins can be transformed into biopolymers, such as bioplastics [59], carbohydrates can serve as prospective sources of bio-hydrogen (bio-H2). Lipids can also be converted into high-value polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), such omega-3 [248] and pigments which contain high concentrations of important carotenoids [11]. Industries have recently made investments in value based products (proteins, fatty acids, astaxanthin, phycocyanins, β-carotene, lipids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosa-hexanoic acid (DHA) by microalgae cultivated in wastewater is turning waste into wealth [25].

Pigments- Phycobiliproteins, Carotenoids, etc.

Primary photosynthetic pigments extracted from microalgae are phycobilins, carotenoids, and chlorophylls [109, 175]. Phycobilins and carotenoids are described below:

Phycobiliproteins

Are highly fluorescent and soluble in water. They have specific cysteine residues linked to a linear prosthetic group (bilins) [100]. These additional pigments are unique to red algae, cyanobacteria and cryptomonads, such as Porphyridium, Nostoc and Arthrospira. A significant function of phycobiliproteins is pigmentat metabolism in microalgae; they also exhibit anti-aging, anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, hepato-protective, and neuro-protective properties [250]. As natural colourant, phycobiliproteins have applications in industries especially in food, cosmetic, pharmaceutical and textile sector, biomedical research and clinical diagnostics [254]. Leftover biomass from the phycobiliprotein production processes are converted into biofertilizer, which is used to produce biogas and recover bioenergy. Arashiro et al. [13] reported the biomass ofNostoc, Phormidium, and Geitlerinemain municipal wastewater, and extracted pigments like phycocyanin, phycoerythrin from microalgae. Combining the extraction of pigments and generation of biogas from residual biomass would result in approximately 5–10% more energy recovery and circular economy [13]. Based on chromophores and composition, phycobiliproteins can be categorized as allophycocyanins (λmax = 650–660 nm), phycoerythrins (λmax = 490–570 nm), and phycocyanins (λmax = 610–625 nm) [69, 137] (Fig. 3).

Phycocyanin

Is a water-soluble protein extracted mainly from red algae and cyanobacteria [95]. Khan et al. [112] reported the presence of phycocyanin and phycoerythrin from newly reported cyanobacteriumTrichocholeus desertorum. Similarly, other robust species should be explored for the presence of value based products and as feedstock for biorefinery. A complex mixture of monomers, trimers, hexamers and other oligomers makes phycocyanins [151, 190]. Applications of phycocyanins are limited by its low stability to light exposure, high pH and elevated temperatures [172]. Stability has been improved and properties have been preserved through the use of additives such as glucose or citric acid [22, 155, 163]. Mastropetros et al. [146] recorded the high growth of cyanobacteriumPhormidium spp. in low organic effluent medium with high phycocyanin production. Global market of phycocyanin is projected to grow at year 2027 to a value of 245.5 million dollars [14]. Arthrospira platensisSpirulina- single cell protein (SCP), is the primary source of the industrialized phycocyanin products, which are available in powder or aqueous form for cosmetics, food and analytical applications. As synthetic colors have many adverse effects, there is an increasing demand for natural colors which are applicable in confectionaries, beverages, drugs, molecular markers, cosmetics, etc. It is also reported to have therapeutic values like immunomodulating activity, anti-oxidant activity, anti-nephrolith activity, anti-cancer activity, etc. [181, 190, 191]. Owing to its fluorescence properties the development of phycofluor probes for immunodiagnostics as a substitute for synthetic dyes was explored Paswan et al. [189]. The fluorescence quenching ability of C-PC with heavy metals can be explored as a selective and sensitive biosensor for heavy metals like Hg+2even in low concentrations [24]. C-PC could also protect against ethanol-induced sub-acute liver injury and improve immunity in mice [260]. Phycocyanin belongs to the family of phycobiliproteins, which also contains two other proteins, allophycocyanin and phycoerythrin (Fig. 3).

Phycoerythrin (PE),

Composed of α, β, and γ subunits, is a primary phycobiliprotein found in Porphyridiumspecies [125,126,127]. With a molecular weight of 263 kDa, PE holds significant economic value and has a wide range of industrial applications. It has garnered considerable attention from the scientific community. However, mechanical processes such as centrifugation and filtration can compromise the integrity of phycobilisomes during harvesting, causing the release of phycobiliproteins into the media and leading to resource loss [50]. PE is found in waste media, but in very small amounts. Balaraman et al. [20] concluded slaughter wastewater is effective in the cultivation of microalgaePorphyrium cruentiumwith large quantity of phycoerythrin. Liang et al. [128] conducted an efficiency recovery of PE by a chitosan based flocculation technique from wastewater with low concentration of phycobilin. Ammonium sulphate precipitation, ultrafiltration, chromatography and aqueous two-phase systems are used in the extraction of phycobiliproteins from the phycobilisome solution [103]. All these methods are applicable to high concentration of phycobilin in wastewater [128]. Recovery method for phycoerythrin is suggested and should be developed from a low concentration of phycobilin in wastewater (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Structures of different phycobiliproteins

Carotenoids

Carotenoids have a stable molecular structure and a 40-carbon polyene chain [213]. Critical chemical characteristics like light absorption, which is required for photosynthesis and oxygen-dependent life, are produced by this structure. A carotenoid may contain oxygenate groups or cyclone groups, which are rings [213]. Carotene is the general term for hydrocarbon carotenoids,however, xanthophyll is the specific term for oxygen derivatives like lutein (which is OH-functional) and canthaxanthin (which is oxy-functional, a keto-carotenoid) [217]. Secondary carotenoids are hydrocarbon carotenoids, also referred to as carotenes, and these carotenoids are named after the primary carotenoids. Primary carotenoids are located on thylakoid membranes. The key distinction between the two is that the microalgae contains photosynthetic apparatus which is primarily made up of structural and functional components, and the microalgae depend on the primary carotenoids to survive. But, the microalgae only produce large amounts of secondary carotenoids when they are subjected to a carotenoid breeding process, involving specific stimulant conditions [132]. There are currently 600 known varieties of carotenoids, 50 of which are found in the diets of humans [208]. Astaxanthin, ß-carotene, lutein, lycopene, zeaxanthin, violaxanthin, and fucoxanthin are the principal carotenoids found in microalgae. Among all, capsanthin, astaxanthin, ß-carotene, fucoxanthin, lutein, lycopene, canthaxanthin, and zeaxanthin are the main carotenoids of market interest [214]. The production of carotenoids by microalgae has several health benefits (Novoveská et al. [171]). Despite the apparent benefits, there is lack of large-scale biomanufacturing for microalgal based carotenoids production. According to Barkia et al. [21], there was a rise in the demand for carotenoids from 1.24 billion USD in 2016 to approximately 1.53 billion USD in 2021. Different types of stress-induced carotenoids in microalgae is described below (Table2).

Table 2 Stress induced carotenoids in microalgae (Adapted from Chokshi et al. [41])
ß-carotene,

A class of fat-soluble tarpon pigments (tarpon: hydrocarbons in general, formula C10H16), is a type of secondary carotenoid that is generally found in plants, microalgae, and photosynthetic bacteria in a range of colors from yellow to red. The principal sources of ꞵ-carotene are Chlamydomonas, Chlorella, Dunaliella, Muriellopsis, and Haematococcusspecies [19, 246]. Typically, microalgae contains mostly all-trans and 9-cisisomers of ß-carotene [80]. ꞵ-carotene is regarded as a precursor to vitamin A (retinol) and an orange pigment. The most important applications of ꞵ-carotene pigments are as antioxidants, edible colors in foods, cosmetics, and cancer therapy [255, 257]. Han et al. [79] extractedß -carotene from Dunaliella spp. grown in poultry litter wastewater. Symbiotic microalgae and yeast (Chlorella sorokiniana and Rhodotorula gracilis) were used as feedstock for production of polyhydroxybutyrate and ß-carotene from dairy wastewater [120] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Biorefinery model for microalgal high value products

Astaxanthin

Is a naturally occurring keto-carotenoid known for its exceptional antioxidant properties, which are approximately 1000 times greater than vitamin E (ɑ-tocopherol) and 10 times greater than other microalgal carotenoids, such as canthaxanthin, β-carotene, lutein and zeaxanthin [192]. This pigment is widely distributed in aquatic species like crabs, salmon and prawns [125,126,127]. Astaxanthin is valued for its anti-oxidative, anti-aging, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atherosclerotic properties and is commonly used as an active ingredient in pharmaceutical products for human consumption (Mokhtari et al. [161]). The annual market value for natural astaxanthin has surpassed US$550 million and continues to rise [233]. The two main producers of astaxanthin areChlorella zofingiensis and Haematococcus pluvialis, while smaller natural producers are Tetraselmis sp., Scenedesmus sp., and Chlorella sorokiniana [134]. Haematococcus pluvialis and Chromochloris zofingiensiswere grown in palm oil mill effluent (POME) to produce astaxanthin and perform altogether phycoremediation [60]. Cheirslip et al. [31] reported improved astaxanthin and co-bioproduct from Haematococcus spp. microalgae combined with industrial wastewater valorization using a two-stage LED lighting scheme.

Fucoxanthin

Is a type of xanthophyll pigment commonly found in brown algae and diatoms. South-east Asia and European nations consume a variety of edible brown algae, such as Sargassam fusiforme, Laminaria japonica, Undaria pinnatifida, and Padina tetrastromatica [256]. While diatoms such asPhaeodactylum tricornutumare preferred sources of fucoxanthin in the food industry due to their higher content, extraction efficiency, and shorter growth cycles compared to macroalgae, brown algae remain valuable sources of this nutrient [196]. Reportedly, fucoxanthin possesses anti-oxidant, anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-obesity properties. Jiang et al. [105] reportedPhaeodactylum tricornutuma diatom removing toxic nutrients from the diluted swine wastewater yielded high amount of fucoxanthin. Numerous studies have indicated that fucoxanthin consumption can support various essential biological functions and exert therapeutic effects on health conditions. Research has demonstrated that fucoxanthin may aid in the management of several chronic medical conditions, including cardiovascular disease, type -2 diabetes, hyper-cholesterolemia, hypertension, obesity, osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, hepatic disorders, cancer, as well as promoting ocular and skeletal health. This compound functions as an antioxidant and scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS), addresses inflammation-related disorders, and exhibits antibacterial properties [17]. As of the latest data, the price for pure fucoxanthin varies between USD 40,000 and 80,000 per kilogram, contingent upon factors such as quality and specific criteria [107]. In 2020, the global market for fucoxanthin was estimated to be approximately USD 600 million and is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6% from 2018 to 2025 [70]. The initial commercial report on microalgal fucoxanthin production emerged in 2018 from Algatechnologies Ltd., an Israeli microalgal biotechnology firm. The company introduced a patented natural oleoresin containing 3% fucoxanthin, marketed under the trademark Fucovital®. This product is derived fromPhaeodactylum tricornutum, cultivated in a fully controlled, closed tubular photobioreactor exposed to sunlight [6].

Lipid content in microalgae grown in different types of wastewaters:

One of the main biochemical constituents of microalgae is lipid. There are reports by various researchers suggesting that, under different stress scenarios, microalgae can accumulate about 60% of TAG, thus providing a viable source for its conversion to biodiesel [183]. The accumulation of lipid in microalgae is often enhanced by culture instances such as nutrient shortage or salinity stress [42, 43, 184], temperature changes [44], or light intensity [67]. The use of diverse wastewater types as a source of organic and inorganic nutrients is a viable strategy for the sustainable production of microalgal biomass. According to a research by Chinnasamy et al. [39, 40], the generation of microalgal biodiesel derived from wastewater can reach 0.40–0.78 t/ha/year. The primary cause of the decreased biodiesel output is the microalgae's reduced lipid content, which can be enhanced by growing the algae in wastewater that contains more organic ingredients.

The lipid content of different microalgae cultured in different wastewaters is displayed in Table 3. According to Ledda et al. [122], in tubular raceway ponds, microalgae Nannochloropsis gaditana when cultured in centrate from wastewater treatment yielded biomass of 0.1 gL-1. However, microalgal development is inhibited and their production of biomass and chlorophyll content is reduced at greater concentrations of centrate (above 30%). This shows that for a larger biomass output, selection and the dilution or pre-treatment of wastewater prior to microalgae growing are also significant. Another study conducted by Gupta et al. [77] showed that when Chlorella sorokiniana is used to treat raw sewage, it has a strong ability to remove nutrients and create lipid content of about 22% w/w of biomass, in comparison to microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus. Nonetheless, Ji et al. [102]'s study revealed that Scenedesmus obliquus can use the nutrients in food wastewater to extract 38.9 mgL-1TN and 12.1 mgL-1TP from 1% of food wastewater in addition to accumulating more lipid and carbohydrates in the cells, which can then be utilized to produce biodiesel and bioethanol. This implies that different types of microalgae may react differently or that the origin of the microalgae may have a major impact on the remediation of wastewater and simultaneously yield some potential high value products. Cyanobacterial lipids (especially GLA) are also known to possess several bioactivities (like antiradical and antimicrobial activities) owing to the essential fatty acids (mainly GLA) rich profile [206]. The most utilized source of γ-linolenic acid is borage oil, but cyanobacteria too have, GLA inS. platensisranged 18– 21% (w/w), of the total fatty acids [221]. The γ-linolenic acid is present in someSpirulina/Arthrospira strains which are with distinguishable characters among different genera [164].

Table 3 Lipid content of various microalgae grown in various wastewaters (Adapted from Pancha et al. [185])

Sometimes wastewater needs to be pre-treated or diluted before being used as a growing medium for microalgae since, a high organic or ammonia load may hinder the growth of the microalgae. Zhu et al. ([267]) demonstrated unequivocally that microalgae Chlorella zofingiensis uses piggery wastewater to make 30 mgL-1 of biodiesel per day; nevertheless, this strain exhibits strong growth and nutrient removal efficiency when the wastewater's COD reaches 1900 mgL-1. Microalgae typically collect a considerable amount of lipid during the nutrient shortage phase, as previously documented. Hemalatha and Mohan [83] reported on an interesting two-stage wastewater treatment method in which they cultured microalgae in a mixotrophic ecosystem utilizing pharmaceutical wastewater to enhance biomass production. The culture was then moved to tap water to increase lipid accumulation.

In conclusion, we can state that the dual role of phycoremediation in conjunction with the production of microalgal biodiesel along with co-products is one of the promising approaches; however, the choice of microalgae, the method of cultivation, and the wastewater pre-treatment are crucial factors that need to be taken into account prior to the full-scale operation.

Fatty acids

Have a hydrocarbon chain that has a methyl group (-CH3) at one end and a carboxyl group (-COOH) [142]. Different families of fatty acids can be identified based on the double bond in relation to the methyl group: omega-3, omega-5, omega-6, omega-7, omega-9, etc. [15]. At the generic level, fatty acids are used as biomarker to differentiate closely related microalgal species [220] in Phytochemistry reported fattyacids as biological marker for identifying the microalgae Microalgae are primary producers of the food chain and hold prominence towards pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications. Fatty acids (FAs) are one of the primary metabolites of microalgae, which enrich their utility both in the form of food and fuels. Additionally, the vast structural diversity coupled with taxonomic specificity makes these FAs as potential biomarkers. The determination of lipid and fatty acid profiling of 12 different strains of microalgae has been accomplished in this study and further discussed in respect to their chemotaxonomic perspective in microalgae. Palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (C18:1n9c) were found to be dominant among the members of Cyanophyceae whereas members of Chlorophyceae were rich in palmitic acid (C16:0), oleic acid (C18:1n9c) and linoleic acid (C18:2n6) [154]. Nutritional value of microalgae is primarily derived from essential fatty acids in microalgae [116]. Among value-added products produced by microalgae, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) or long-chain fatty acids is well known for their beneficial impact on human health. Distribution of fatty acids in the two strainsS. maxima and S. platensis have been reported [154]. Spirulina maxima (% of total fatty acids) Spirulina platensis (% of total fatty acids) palmitic (16:0) 63 25.8 palmitoleic (16:1 omega-6) 2 3.8 stearic (18:0) 1 1.7 oleic (18:1 omega-6) 4 16.6 linoleic (18:2 omega-6) 9 12 gamma-linolenic (18:3 omega-6) 13 40.1 alpha-linolenic (18:3 omega-3) traces gamma-linolenic acid represents only 10-20% of fatty acids in S. maxima, i.e. 1-2% of dry matter [91, 154], compared to 40% inS. platensis, or some 4% of dry weight. Thus, Spirulina can be considered one of the best-known sources of gamma-linolenic acid, after human milk and some vegetable oils having high nutrient value.

DHA and EPA

Through the trophic levels in marine food web, species of microalgae produce two nutritionally significant PUFAs namely docosahexanoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) [209]. EPA and DHA supplements lowers risk of inflammation and prevent cardiovascular disease [47]. DHA is essential for protecting against damage, lowering inflammation and preserving the fluidity of the brain and membrane of retina [216]. Recent improvements in the cost-effectiveness of producing PUFAs have led many producers to focus more on PUFA production. Tossavainen et al. [249] performed the biomass growth of mixed algae namelyEuglena gracilis with Selenastrum in aquaculture wastewater and observed the high amount of DHA and EPA and concluded microalgae enriched with PUFA (DHA and EPA) which can be used in replacement of fish oil as feed. Aurantiochytriumsp. was cultivated for phycoremediation of food based wastewater and production of PUFA for fish aquaculture [92]. Green microalgae,Scenedesmus sp.was used for phycoremediation of wastewater and large amount of fatty acids [251]. High production of both saturated and unsaturated fatty acids suggests a viable potential for biodiesel production.

Sterols

Derived from microalgae are recognized to possess beneficial bioactive properties, including the ability to lower cholesterol, reduce inflammation and potentially inhibit cancer growth. By 2022, the phytosterol market is predicted to generate USD$935 million in sales worldwide [207]. Notably, β-sitosterol, campesterol, brassicasterol, stigmasterol, and ergosterol are commercially significant phytosterols. Currently, phytosterols are primarily sourced from vegetable and tall oils extracted from land plants. By 2030 and beyond, it is expected that the land-based sources will be unable to keep up with the growing demand. Safafar et al. [218] cultivated six microalgae from various classesNannochloropsis sp. (Eustigmatophyceae), Desmodesmus sp. (Chlorophyta), Chlorella sp., and Dunaliella sp. (Bacillariophyceae) for phycoremediation of industrial wastewater and production of value based products. Desmodesmus cultivated well in industrial wastewater and produced large amount of tocopherol, carotenoids and phenolic compounds. Mitra et al, [157] reported EPA production through Nannochloropsis oceanica grown in various waste waters.

The eicosapentaenoic acid rich marine eustigmatophyte Nannochloropsis oceanica was grown in wastewaters sampled from four different industries (i.e. pesticides industry, pharmaceutical industry, activated sludge treatment plant of municipality sewage and petroleum (oil) industry). Under the wastewater based growth conditions used in this study, the biomass productivity ranged from 21.78 ± 0.87 to 27.78 ± 0.22 mg L−1 d−1 in relation to freeze dried biomass, while the lipid productivity varied between 5.59 ± 0.02 and 6.81 ± 0.04 mg L−1 d−1. Although comparatively higher biomass, lipid and EPA productivity was observed in Conway medium, the %EPA content was similarly observed in pesticides industry and municipal effluents.

Polyhydroxyalkanoates

(PHAs) are biopolyesters synthesized by microorganisms under nutrient-limited conditions [54, 153]. Microalgae are easily obtainable living fossil and are expected to be a major source of PHAs ( biodegradable), with low solvency resistance, high purity within cells, resistant to UV light, and possess both thermoplastic and elastomeric qualities [203]. They extracted PHAs from the Chlorella vulgaris. The physicochemical characteristics and biodegradability of PHAs represents one of the most promising prospective alternatives to traditional non-biodegradable plastics [241]. Four different nordic microalgal species were grown in wastewater, as an inexpensive and high-carbohydrate feedstock for microbial fermentation that yields polyhydroxybutyrate (PHBs) [148]. The most PHBs was produced using the hydrolysate ofDesmodesmus sp., followed by Chlorococcum sp. [148]. Pyruvate supplementation, combined with mixed microbial cultures (MMC) and organic wastewater, has enhanced the production, extraction, and characterization of PHAs from swine wastewater [229]. Despite extensive efforts to overcome production barriers by using low-cost, renewable substrates and continuously advancing sustainable biopolymer production [215], only a few companies currently produce PHAs commercially The exploitation ofArthrospirasp. for polyhydroxy butyrate (PHB) accumulation was reported by [231]. A study conducted onA. platensissuggested that high internal phosphate might restrict NADPH accumulation along with PHB biosynthesis even after 30 days of phosphate limitation [186]. In one of the studies,Spirulina-based bioplastics indicated better blending performance which could positively commercialize the product suitable for various applications [262]. Polyhydroxyalkanoates have wide applications in various sectors from household to medical areas like tissue engineering [223].

Carbohydrate

A necessary substance, carbohydrates can be found in the microalgal cell at varying levels as starch and cellulose [88]. Depending on the species, the amount of carbohydrates in microalgal biomass ranges from 10 to 52% [88]. Tan et al. [242] investigated biomass and carbohydrate productivity through the growth ofScenedesmus parvus (S. parvus) both indoors and outdoors. According to the results, in extremely acidic circumstances, S. parvus produced 12640 ± 1.0 mg L^1 biomass and 15.47 ± 0.048 mg L^1d~1. Additionally, the carbohydrates (270 mg g-1 biomass) from the biomass of Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) were recovered by Alavijeh et al. [7]. Nzayisenga et al. [173] cultivatedChlorella sp. heterotrophically and mixotrophically to produce carbohydrates, using glycerol, glucose, and wastewater from municipalities as a source of nutrients or a medium for growth. Nevertheless, certain algae's low carbohydrate content raises the price of value products and microalgae-based bio-refineries. The carbohydrate content of Arthrospira constitute approximately 15% of the dry matter, majorly polysaccharides. Although, Arthrospirausually contain 10 – 20 % carbohydrate, however under some stress conditions it accumulates an ample amount of carbohydrates which makes them potent bioethanol feedstock for future applications [145]. The nutrient stress exerted by cultivating using wastewater nutrients and stress caused by CO2 fixation also resulted in the accumulation of carbohydrates in theA. platensis [222].

Proteins

Protein is made from several kinds of amino acids, which are produced by microalgae. Tetraselmis chuii (T. chuii), B. braunii, and Porphyridium aerugineum (P. aerugineum) are microalgae cells that contain tryptophan, lysine, leucine, and arginine; Nannochloropsis granulate(N. granulate) has leucine in its cells [247].

According to Nehme et al. [168], the pharmaceutical, health, and nutrition sectors all heavily rely on critical amino acids for their products. Furthermore, it may be used as dietary supplements and has applications in pigmentation, reproduction, and the control of metabolic activity in both adults and new-borns [259]. Numerous investigations revealed that MSAs are present in the cells ofChlamydomonas nivalis (C. nivalis), C. sorokiniana, and Desmodesmussp. [68]. As a result, microalgae biomass must be taken into account as a rich source of protein that may be used as nutrient supplement in the food and feed, pharmaceutical, and nutritional industries. Certain microalgae strains may have their protein and amino acid production increased by adjusting their metabolic pathways to up-regulate the relevant genes.Arthrospiracontains 70% protein of its total dry weight (mainly composed of Phycocyanin) [190]. Due to the absence of cellulosic walls, the protein ofArthrospira shows very high digestibility (83-90% as compared to 95.1% for pure casein). The use of such biomass has gained attention both as an alternative source of alimentary protein and as a collusive in dietary treatment requiring a reduced caloric intake. Spirulina is a well known source of protein which can be used in functional foods and grown in waste waters sequestering various toxic metals [154].

Vitamins

Arthrospira is claimed to be a rich source of vitamins, especially vitamin B12and vitamin- E [227]. It has been reported that hydrogen peroxide stress induced inA. platensisleads to a 4-fold increase in Vitamin C and an 8-fold increase in α- tocopherol [1]. Many cyanobacteria are reported to produce vitamins that plants do not prepare such as Vitamin B12 [76]. The biomass ofArthrospirawas also found to be rich in pro-vitamin A, B1, B2, B6, D, and E [87]. In a study conducted on Chinese adults, it was found that vitamin A equivalence ofArthrospira β-carotene improves the vitamin A content in the human body upon consumption [244]. Thus, making a ground for its future exploitation in several vitamin deficiency diseases. Spirulina is rich in a wide range of vitamins and minerals essential for maintaining a healthy immune system, like, B6, E, and C. Spirulina is reported also to boost the production of white blood cells and antibodies that fight viruses and bacteria in our body. Dry Spirulinacontains 50-190mg/kg of Vitamin E [55], a level comparable to that of wheat germ, and daily requirements of Vitamin E is estimated at 15 IU (29) or 12mg of free tocopherols.

Enzymes

Plasmids and chloroplasts, which are photosynthetic organelles, were principally obtained by the endosymbiotic absorption of a cyanobacterium. Following rounds of secondary and even tertiary endosymbiosis, these initial plastids (found in chlorophytes and rhodophytes) were subsequently transferred to other eukaryotic clades (BBC Research, Report). Microorganism-derived enzymes have the potential to serve as catalysts in a variety of industrial processes. There is a continuous need for sustainable solutions in the hunt for novel sources of microbial enzymes. Several findings demonstrate the high capacity of microalgal cells to synthesize enzymes, despite the fact that microalgae are not currently used in the commercial manufacturing of enzymes [198]. There have been reports of other groups of enzymes, such as lyases, oxidoreductases, and hydrolases. Holocellulases are a group of enzymes that break down the carbohydrate polymers found in the cell walls of plants and algae. They include cellulases, hemicellulases, and pectinases. It has been discovered that strains of Anabaena may be capable of producing hydrolytic enzymes with fungicidal potential. The marine carbohydrase, or algal polysaccharidases, as classified by CAZymes, include agarases, carrageenases, and alginate lyases [124]. These enzymes have distinct structural and biochemical characteristics and are not closely connected to the glycoside hydrolases that are now understood. α-amylase activity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii growing photo-autotrophically in 12-h/12-h light/dark cycles was reported by Levis and Gibbs, [124]. After four hours of darkness, amylase attained its peak activity and it continued to be active throughout the whole cell cycle [124]. It has been reported that the unicellular golden-brown algae Pothierochromonas malhamensis which has an osmotic control mechanism, contains intracellular α-galactosidase (α-gal) activity. In cell-free extracts, P. malhamensis α-gal has maximum activity at pH 7.0. There is an increase in intracellular enzyme activity when the external osmotic pressure is high. Within a few minutes this situation results in cell shrinkage (plasmolysis). The cell produces intracellular isofloridoside (α-galactosylglycerol) via biosynthesis as a recuperation mechanism. In response to increased external osmotic pressure, α-galactosidase is produced, which in turn lowers the intracellular concentration of isofloridoside (O-α-D-galactopyranosyl-(1 → 1) glycerol) and releases galactose and glycerol. A portion of the carbon released is integrated into the algal cell's store of β-glucans or as wall components [52]. A calcium-dependent serine protease from the cyanobacterium Anabaena variabilis was described by Lockau et al. [133]. This protease, which resembles trypsin, requires calcium for full activity. Strohmeier et al. [236] demonstrated that A. variabilis possesses a second soluble trypsin-like protease, a prolylendopeptidase, by using the A. variabilis mutant IM 141, which is devoid of this calcium-dependent protease [133, 236]. Compared to lipases found in bacteria, fungi, animals and plants, relatively little research has been done on microalgal lipases or the genes producing them. Some researchers have identified and described lipase from the photosynthetic cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis [51]. The intracellular proportion of the following four species of thermotolerant blue-green algae that were isolated in Thailand showed phytase activity from Synechococcus SKP50, S. lividus DSK74, Chroococcidiopsis thermalis Gehler, and Synechococcus bigranulatus Skuja. The highest recorded enzyme activity of 1.83 mU mL−1 was attained by S. lividus SKP50. There was no phytotase activity in the extracellular culture broth. Furthermore, Tethacystis aeria and Shewanella xiamenensis, two soil microalgae, have been found to exhibit laccase activity on the substrate 2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) [169, 178]. Although prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have SODs, not much is known about the action of SODs in microalgae. A Mn-SOD from the microalgae Porphyridium cruentum was isolated by Misra and Fridovich, [156]. The enzyme was stable when frozen and thawed, with a molecular weight of 40 kDa [96].

Biofertilizers and biostimulants

Since three decades, farmers have been using chemical fertilizers, but repeated and excessive use of these fertilizers gradually deteriorated soil quality resulting in progressively diminishing crop yield [131]. Various agricultural land has drastically become barren and unproductive which could be recovered through biofertilizers/manures. The role of microalgae in the soil ecosystem is neglected, though they contribute to soil health and benefit crops in many ways. The potential benefits of cyanobacteria inrice fields are the degradation of pesticides employed in the crop [239], soil amelioration, soil conditioning and releasing inhibitors of plant pathogens [111], and production of plant growth-promoting substance.Recently microalgae have been used in agriculture as natural biofertilizers to enhance soil properties because of their inherent high concentrations of macro- and micronutrients that are essential for plant growth, health, and development [75]. Microalgal biofertilizers improve nutrient absorption in plants with greater development and agricultural yields, according to recent studies [211]. According to Abinandan et al. [3], biofertilizers are an economical, sustainable, organic substitute for synthetic fertilisers that also pose minimal environmental impact. Furthermore, an increasing body of research indicates that microalgae can enhance soil health, lessen erosion, aid in crust formation, treat agricultural runoff, remove metals from the soil, and aid in nitrogen recovery [29]. As secondary products, biofertilizers range in price from USD 300 to USD 1200 per tonne,the industry was estimated to be worth USD 2.3 billion in 2020 (Biofertilizers industry, [26]. The prediction indicates that throughout the next ten years, the worldwide market for biofertilizers would develop at a faster rate due to a number of initiatives and advantageous rules enacted by governmental bodies [6]. The effect of algalization on paddy yield and its nutrition were analyzed by us. The application of the mat in conjunction with different doses of fertilizer was performed in the paddy fields of Andhra Pradesh, India.Leptolyngbya boryana mat acted as a promising metal sequester and demonstrated an elicited photosynthetic activity (2-fold increase in Chl-a), carbohydrate (2-fold increase), and lipid (1.7-fold increase) content (% w/w) after 2-month cultivation. It also displayed proficient metal (ppm) uptake efficiency in the order Ca > Fe > Mg > K > Na > Mn > Zn > Cr. In grains, higher nutrient accumulation for Fe (~2-fold), Mg (~1.5-fold), and Ca (~5-fold), and a significantly higher translocation factor (Tf) in the order Ca > K > Mg were recorded. In essence, algalization substantially improved the overall nutritive quality of the rice grains, especially their iron content [205].

Recommendations and suggestions

  1. 1.

    Bioremediation Integration: Microalgae will be key players in comprehensive bioremediation, tackling pollutants in various sources such as domestic and industrial wastewaters alongside biomass production with high value products. Their role extends beyond biomass; efficient removal of contaminants, contributing to cleaner environments with sustainable practices.

  2. 2.

    Biorefinery Expansion: The significance of microalgae in biorefinery will definitely expand, serving as feedstock for diverse high-value products like biofuels, pharmaceuticals and cosmetic ingredients. Beyond lipids and proteins, it drives the production of a wide array of valuable compounds, enhancing the versatility of biorefinery concepts.

  3. 3.

    Circular Bio-economy Implementation: Microalgal cultivation will integrate into circular bioeconomy models, emphasizing resource recycling and reuse within closed-loop systems. This integration will not only enhance sustainability but, also minimize waste generation and environmental impact, promoting eco-friendly practices.

  4. 4.

    Synergistic Microalgae Systems: The future holds the development of synergistic microalgae systems, co-cultured with bacteria or fungi, enhancing productivity, nutrient production and nutrient cycling. These integrated systems will optimize resource utilization, maximizing biomass and high-value product production while bolstering system resilience.

  5. 5.

    Advanced Genetic Engineering: Continued advancements in genetic engineering, like CRISPR, will lead to the creation of genetically modified microalgae strains with enhanced traits i.e. 4th generation energy feedstock. These strains will be tailored for specific applications, including pigment production, bioremediation, and biorefinery processes, revolutionizing sustainable biotechnologies.

  6. 6.

    The envisaged future scope is dependent on metabolic and genetic engineering. The majority of the products have been produced from only a handful of the genera. Moreover, with the onset of various OMICS approaches, they have become attractive candidates for improved secondary metabolites, the intervention of synthetic biology toolssuch as gene editing, metabolic engineering, and a variety of metabolomics/ fluxomics, can be used to have significantly enhanced production of desired high-value secondary metabolites. The uptake rate of technologies being developed is too slow due to general unawareness of the benefits of the algal products.

Conclusion

There is an urgency of addressing water scarcity and means of combating the critical issue through innovative wastewater treatment approaches. Microalgae-based solutions present a promising avenue for both remediation and biomass production for multiple high value products integrated in a biorefinery approach i.e. ‘ a win win situation’ of waste management with the microalgal feedstock generation having lot of potential benefits. Moving forward with focus on refining cultivation techniques and optimizing biorefinery processes to enhance efficiency and reduce costs. Collaborative efforts between researchers, industries, and policymakers will be crucial in driving the implementation of microalgae-based wastewater treatment on a larger scale. By investing in research and development, we can unlock the full potential of microalgae and pave the way for a sustainable future for water, health, environment and energy.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Abd El Baky HH, El Baroty GS. Optimization of Growth Conditions for Purification and Production of L-Asparaginase by Spirulina maxima. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016(1):1785938.

  2. Abdolahpur Monikh F, Arenas-Lago D, Porcal P, Grillo R, Zhang P, Guo Z, Vijver MG, JGM Peijnenburg, W. Do the joint effects of size, shape and ecocorona influence the attachment and physical eco (cyto) toxicity of nanoparticles to algae?. Nanotoxicology. 2020;14(3):310-325.

  3. Abinandan S, Subashchandrabose SR, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M. Soil microalgae and cyanobacteria: the biotechnological potential in the maintenance of soil fertility and health. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39:981–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abou-Shanab RA, Ji MK, Kim HC, Paeng KJ, Jeon BH. Microalgal species growing on piggery wastewater as a valuable candidate for nutrient removal and biodiesel production. J Environ Manage. 2013;115:257–64.

  5. Abou-Shanab RA, El-Dalatony MM, EL-Sheekh MM, Ji MK, Salama ES, Kabra AN, Jeon BH. Cultivation of a new microalga, Micractinium reisseri, in municipal wastewater for nutrient removal, biomass, lipid, and fatty acid production. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2014;19(3):510–518.

  6. Abu-Ghosh S, Dubinsky Z, Verdelho V, Iluz D. Unconventional high-value products from microalgae: A review. Bioresour Technol.y. 2021;329:124895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alavijeh RS, Karimi K, Wijffels RH, van den Berg C, Eppink M. Combined bead milling and enzymatic hydrolysis for efficient fractionation of lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates of Chlorella vulgaris microalgae. Bioresour Technol. 2020;309:123321. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alprol, A.E., Khedawy, M., Ashour, M. and Thabet, W.M. 2023. Arthrospira platensis nanoparticle-based approach for efficient removal of methyl orange dye from aqueous solutions: isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic analysis. Biomass Convers. Biorefin., pp.1-18.

  9. Altowayti WAH, Shahir S, Othman N, Eisa TAE, Yafooz WM, Al-Dhaqm A, Soon CY, Yahya IB, Che Rahim NANB, Abaker M, Ali A. The role of conventional methods and artificial intelligence in the wastewater treatment: a comprehensive review. Processes. 2022;10(9):1832.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Annapoorna, B.R., Vasudevan, S., Sindhu, K., Vani, V., Nivya, V., Venkateish, V.P. and Kumar, P.M. 2022. Hepatoprotective Marine Phytochemicals: Recent Perspectives. Mar. Biochem., pp.207-230.

  11. Ambati RR, Gogisetty D, Aswathanarayana RG, Ravi S, Bikkina PN, Bo L, Yuepeng S. Industrial potential of carotenoid pigments from microalgae: Current trends and future prospects. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(12):1880–902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aranda-Vega Y, Bhatt P, Huang JY, Brown P, Bhasin A, Hussain AS, Simsek H. Biodegradability and bioavailability of dissolved substances in aquaculture effluent: Performance of indigenous bacteria, cyanobacteria, and green microalgae. Environ Pollut. 2024;345:123468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arashiro LT, Ferrer I, Pániker CC, Gómez-Pinchetti JL, Rousseau DP, Van Hulle SW, Garfí M. Natural pigments and biogas recovery from microalgae grown in wastewater. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8(29):10691–701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashaolu TJ, Samborska K, Lee CC, Tomas M, Capanoglu E, Tarhan Ö, Taze B, Jafari SM. Phycocyanin, a super functional ingredient from algae; properties, purification characterization, and applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;193:2320–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Avula, S.G.C. 2016. Lipidomics of Algae and Human Plasma by Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Techniques (Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State University).

  16. Bachani P, Bhattacharya S, Jain D, Patidar SK, Soundarya R, Tirkey SR, Ranawat B, Vamsi Bharadwaj SV, Mishra S. Bioprospecting of halotolerant bacterial isolates for potassium recovery from K-Feldspar. Chem Eng Technol. 2016;39(9):1645–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bae, M., Kim, M.B., Park, Y.K., Lee, J.Y. 2020. Health benefits of fucoxanthin in the prevention of chronic diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. LipidsBiochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids p. 158618, https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bbalip.2020.158618.

  18. Baicha Z, Salar-García M, Ortiz-Martínez V, Hernández-Fernández F, de los Ríos A, Labjar N, Lotfi E, Elmahi M. A critical review on microalgae as an alternative source for bioenergy production: A promising low cost substrate for microbial fuel cells. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;154:104–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baidya, A., Akter, T., Islam, M.R., Shah, A.A., Hossain, M.A., Salam, M.A. and Paul, S.I. Effect of different wavelengths of LED light on the growth, chlorophyll, β-carotene content and proximate composition of Chlorella ellipsoidea. Heliyon. 2021;7(12).

  20. Balaraman HB, Sivasubramanian A, Rathnasamy SK. Sustainable valorization of meat processing wastewater with synergetic eutectic mixture based purification of R-Phycoerythrin from Porphyridium cruentium. Bioresour Technol. 2021;336:125357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barkia I, Saari N, Manning SR. Microalgae for high-value products towards human health and nutrition. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(5):304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhattacharya P, Jana S, Banerjee S. Phytoremediation capability of Anabaena sp. for high organic and chromium-loaded wastewater in membrane bioreactors. Water Sci Technol. 2024;89(5):1142–54.

  23. Bhattacharya S, Mishra S, Zuorro A, Salama HH, Rusu AV, Trif M. ε-Polylysine derived from marine bacteria-A possible natural preservative for raw milk storage. Fermentation. 2023;9(2):156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhayani K, Mitra M, Ghosh T, Mishra S. C-Phycocyanin as a potential biosensor for heavy metals like Hg 2+ in aquatic systems. RSC Adv. 2016;6(112):111599–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bhayani, K., Pancha, I. and Mishra, S., 2022. Cyanobacterial phycobiliproteins–Biochemical strategies to improve the production and its bio- application. In Algal Biorefineries and the Circular Bioeconomy (pp. 339-368). CRC Press.

  26. Biofertilizers Market, 2021. Biofertilizers Market by Form (Liquid, Carrier-Based), Mode of Application (Soil Treatment, Seed Treatment), Crop Type, Type (Nitrogen-Fixing, Phosphate Solubilizing & Mobilizing, Potash Solubilizing & Mobilizing), Region - Global Forecast to 2025. Biofertilizers Market. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/compound-biofertilizers-customized-fertilizers-market-856.html?gclid=Cj0KCQiAhP2BBhDdARIsAJEzXlEkF1eSdH2KUL3nwAB2O09fxC5VIXkjEcvHQTyAtnLf1ROFCrquYQcaAsM-EALw_wcB.

  27. Boelee NC, Temmink H, Janssen M, Buisman CJN, Wijffels RH. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater effluent using microalgal biofilms. Water Res. 2011;45(18):5925–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Borowitzka MA. High-value products from microalgae—Their development and commercialisation. J Appl Phycol. 2013;2013(25):743–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Castro JS, Calijuri ML, Ferreira J, Assemany PP, Ribeiro VJ. Microalgae based biofertilizer: a life cycle approach. Sci Total Environ. 2020;724:138138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chai WS, Tan WG, Munawaroh HSH, Gupta VK, Ho SH, Show PL. Multifaceted roles of microalgae in the application of wastewater biotreatment: a review. Environ Pollut. 2021;269:116236.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheirsilp B, Wantip K, Chai-issarapap N, Maneechote W, Pekkoh J, Duangjan K, Ruangrit K, Pumas C, Pathom-aree W, Srinuanpan S. Enhanced production of astaxanthin and co-bioproducts from microalga Haematococcus sp. integrated with valorization of industrial wastewater under two-stage LED light illumination strategy. Environ Technol Innov. 2022;28:102620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen M, Yang Y, Braunstein E, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM. Gut expression and regulation of FAT/CD36: possible role in fatty acid transport in rat enterocytes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281(5):E916–23.

  33. Chen YH, Chang GK, Kuo SM, Huang SY, Hu I, Lo YL, Shih SR. Well-tolerated Spirulina extract inhibits influenza virus replication and reduces virus-induced mortality. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen J, Wang Y, Benemann JR, Zhang X, Hu H, Qin S. Microalgal industry in China: challenges and prospects. J Appl Phycol. 2016;28:715–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen YD, Liu F, Ren NQ, Ho SH. Revolutions in algal biochar for different applications: State-of-the-art techniques and future scenarios. Chin Chem Lett. 2020;31(10):2591–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheng, P., Chen, D., Liu, W., Cobb, K., Zhou, N., Liu, Y., Liu, H., Wang, Q., Chen, P., Zhou, C. and Ruan, R. 2020. Auto-flocculation microalgae species Tribonema sp. and Synechocystis sp. with T-IPL pretreatment to improve swine wastewater nutrient removal. Sci. Total Environ., 725, p.138263.

  37. Chew KW, Yap JY, Show PL, Suan NH, Juan JC, Ling TC, Lee DJ, Chang JS. Microalgae biorefinery: high value products perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2017;229:53–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chini Zittelli G, Lauceri R, Faraloni C, Silva Benavides AM, Torzillo G. Valuable pigments from microalgae: phycobiliproteins, primary carotenoids, and fucoxanthin. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2023;22(8):1733–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chinnasamy S, Bhatnagar A, Hunt RW, Das KC. Microalgae cultivation in a wastewater dominated by carpet mill effluents for biofuel applications. Bioresour Technol. 2010a;101(9):3097–105.

  40. Chinnasamy S, Bhatnagar A, Claxton R, Das KC. Biomass and bioenergy production potential of microalgae consortium in open and closed bioreactors using untreated carpet industry effluent as growth medium. Bioresour Technol. 2010b;101(17):6751–60.

  41. Chokshi K, Pancha I, Ghosh A, Mishra S. Oxidative stress-induced bioprospecting of microalgae. Syst Biol Mar Ecosyst. 2017;251–76.

  42. Chokshi K, Pancha I, Ghosh A, Mishra S. Salinity induced oxidative stress alters the physiological responses and improves the biofuel potential of green microalgae Acutodesmus dimorphus. Bioresour Technol. 2017a;244:1376–83.

  43. Chokshi K, Pancha I, Ghosh A, Mishra S. Nitrogen starvation-induced cellular crosstalk of ROS-scavenging antioxidants and phytohormone enhanced the biofuel potential of green microalga Acutodesmus dimorphus. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017b;10:1–12.

  44. Chokshi K, Pancha I, Trivedi K, George B, Maurya R, Ghosh A, Mishra S. Biofuel potential of the newly isolated microalgae Acutodesmus dimorphus under temperature induced oxidative stress conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2015;180:162–71.

  45. Chong JWR, Tan X, Khoo KS, Ng HS, Jonglertjunya W, Yew GY, Show PL. Microalgae-based bioplastics: future solution towards mitigation of plastic wastes. Environ Res. 2022;206:112620.

  46. Chu, W.L. and Phang, S.M., 2019. Biosorption of heavy metals and dyes from industrial effluents by microalgae. Microalgae biotechnology for development of biofuel and waste water treatment, pp.599-634.

  47. Cottin SC, Sanders TA, Hall WL. The differential effects of EPA and DHA on cardiovascular risk factors. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011;70(2):215–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Danouche, M., El Ghachtouli, N. and El Arroussi, H. Phycoremediation mechanisms of heavy metals using living green microalgae: physicochemical and molecular approaches for enhancing selectivity and removal capacity. Heliyon, 2021;7(7).

  49. Das PK, Rani J, Rawat S, Kumar S. Microalgal co-cultivation for biofuel production and bioremediation: current status and benefits. BioEnergy Res. 2022;15(1):1–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Deepika C, Wolf J, Roles J, Ross I, Hankamer B. Sustainable production of pigments from cyanobacteria. In: Cyanobacteria in Biotechnology: Applications and Quantitative Perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 171–251.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Demir BS, Tükel SS. Purification and characterization of lipase from Spirulina platensis. J Mol Catal B. 2010;64(3-4):123–8.

  52. Dey PM, Kauss H. α-galactosidase of Poterioochromonas malhamensis. Phytochemistry. 1981;20(1):45–8.

  53. Dolganyuk V, Belova D, Babich O, Prosekov A, Ivanova S, Katserov D, Patyukov N, Sukhikh S. Microalgae: A promising source of valuable bioproducts. Biomolecules. 2020;10(8):1153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Dubey S, Mishra S. Efficient production of polyhydroxyalkanoate through halophilic bacteria utilizing algal biodiesel waste residue. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:624859.

  55. Earthrise, I. 1986. Product Typical Analysis. Earthrise Farms Spirulina San Raphael, USA. In International Symposium on cyanobacteria for health, science and development (pp. 104-108).

  56. Einali A, Valizadeh J. Propyl gallate promotes salt stress tolerance in green microalga Dunaliella salina by reducing free radical oxidants and enhancing β-carotene production. Acta Physiol Plant. 2015;37:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. El-Baky A, Hanaa H, El Baz FK, El-Baroty GS. Enhancement of antioxidant production in Spirulina platensis under oxidative stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2009;31(3):623–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Farooq W, Lee YC, Ryu BG, Kim BH, Kim HS, Choi YE, Yang JW. Two-stage cultivation of two Chlorella sp. strains by simultaneous treatment of brewery wastewater and maximizing lipid productivity. Bioresour Technol. 2013;132:230–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Felix M, Perez-Puyana V, Romero A, Guerrero A. Development of protein-based bioplastics modified with different additives. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134(42):45430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Fernando JSR, Premaratne M, Dinalankara DMSD, Perera GLNJ, Ariyadasa TU. Cultivation of microalgae in palm oil mill effluent (POME) for astaxanthin production and simultaneous phycoremediation. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(4):105375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Fito J, Van Hulle SW. Wastewater reclamation and reuse potentials in agriculture: towards environmental sustainability. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(3):2949–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Fleurence, J. and Levine, I.A., 2018. Anti-allergic and allergic properties. In Microalgae in health and disease prevention (pp. 307-315). Academic Press.

  63. Gallego R, Valdés A, Suárez-Montenegro ZJ, Sánchez-Martínez JD, Cifuentes A, Ibáñez E, Herrero M. Anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective evaluation of diverse microalgae extracts enriched in carotenoids. Algal Res. 2022;67:102830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Gao, F., Sa, ´ M., Cabanelas, I.T.D., Wijffels, R.H., Barbosa, M.J. Improved fucoxanthin and docosahexaenoic acid productivities of a sorted self-settling Tisochrysis lutea phenotype at pilot scale. Bioresour Technol. 2021;325:124725.

  65. Gatamaneni Loganathan B, Orsat V, Lefsrud M. Utilizing the microalgal biomass of Chlorella variabilis and Scenedesmus obliquus produced from the treatment of synthetic dairy wastewater as a biofertilizer. J Plant Nutr. 2020;44(10):1486–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Gentili FG. Microalgal biomass and lipid production in mixed municipal, dairy, pulp and paper wastewater together with added flue gases. Bioresour Technol. 2014;169:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. George B, Pancha I, Desai C, Chokshi K, Paliwal C, Ghosh T, Mishra S. Effects of different media composition, light intensity and photoperiod on morphology and physiology of freshwater microalgae Ankistrodesmus falcatus–A potential strain for bio-fuel production. Bioresour Technol. 2014;171:367–74.

  68. Gharib R, Tabarzad M, Hosseinabadi T. Effect of high salinity on mycosporine-like amino acid production in Desmodesmus sp. Trends Pept. Protein Sci. 2020;5:16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.22037/tpps.v5i0.28876.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Ghosh, T., Rawat, I., Bala, K., Mishra, S., & Bux, F. Assessing the potential of C-phycocyanin as a natural colorant for non-alcoholic carbonated beverages. J Appl Phycol. 2024:1-9.

  70. Global Fucoxanthin Market, 2020. Growth factors, top manufacturers, future investment, segmentation, share, size, CAGR, latest trends and Forecast. https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/fucoxanthin-market-2020-growth-factors-topmanufacturers-future-investment-segmentation-share-size-cagr-latest-trendsforecast-2025-2020-11-08.

  71. Goh PS, Lau WJ, Ismail AF, Samawati Z, Liang YY, Kanakaraju D. Microalgae-enabled wastewater treatment: A sustainable strategy for bioremediation of pesticides. Water. 2022;15(1):70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. González-González LM, De-Bashan LE. Toward the enhancement of microalgal metabolite production through microalgae–bacteria consortia. Biology. 2021;10(4):282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Grama SB, Liu Z, Li J. Emerging trends in genetic engineering of microalgae for commercial applications. Mar Drugs. 2022;20(5):285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Guiry MD. How many species of algae are there?. J Phycol. 2012;48(5):1057–63.

  75. Guo G, Guan J, Sun S, Liu J, Zhao Y. Nutrient and heavy metal removal from piggery wastewater and CH4 enrichment in biogas based on microalgae cultivation technology under different initial inoculum concentration. Water Environ Res. 2020;92(6):922–33.

  76. Gupta V, Ratha SK, Sood A, Chaudhary V, Prasanna R. New insights into the biodiversity and applications of cyanobacteria (blue-green algae)—prospects and challenges. Algal Res. 2013;2:79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Gupta PL, Choi HJ, Lee SM. Enhanced nutrient removal from municipal wastewater assisted by mixotrophic microalgal cultivation using glycerol. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:10114–23.

  78. Gutiérrez-Casiano N, Hernández-Aguilar E, Alvarado-Lassman A, Méndez-Contreras JM. Removal of carbon and nitrogen in wastewater from a poultry processing plant in a photobioreactor cultivated with the microalga Chlorella vulgaris. J Environ Sci Health, Part A. 2022;57(7):620–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Han T, Lu H, Zhao Y, Xu H, Zhang Y, Li B. Two-step strategy for obtaining Dunaliella sp. biomass and β-carotene from anaerobically digested poultry litter wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2019;143:104714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Harvey PJ, Ben-Amotz A. Towards a sustainable Dunaliella salina microalgal biorefinery for 9-cis β-carotene production. Algal Res. 2020;50:102002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. He Y, Lian J, Wang L, Su H, Tan L, Xu Q, Wang H, Li Y, Li M, Han D, Hu Q. Enhanced brewery wastewater purification and microalgal production through algal-bacterial synergy. J Clean Prod. 2022;376:134361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Heimann K. Handbook of Marine Microalgae, Microalgal Classification. 2015. p. 25–41.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  83. Hemalatha M, Mohan SV. Microalgae cultivation as tertiary unit operation for treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater associated with lipid production. Bioresour Technol. 2016;215:117–22.

  84. Hena S, Fatimah S, Tabassum S. Cultivation of algae consortium in a dairy farm wastewater for biodiesel production. Water Res Indus. 2015;10:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Holbrook GP, Davidson Z, Tatara RA, Ziemer NL, Rosentrater KA, Grayburn WS. Use of the microalga Monoraphidium sp. grown in wastewater as a feedstock for biodiesel: cultivation and fuel characteristics. Appl Energy. 2014;131:386–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Hong ME, Hwang SK, Chang WS, Kim BW, Lee J, Sim SJ. Enhanced autotrophic astaxanthin production from Haematococcus pluvialis under high temperature via heat stress-driven Haber-Weiss reaction. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:5203–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Hoseini SM, Khosravi-Darani K, Mozafari MR. Nutritional and medical applications of Spirulina microalgae. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2013;13(8):1231–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Hossain N, Mahlia TMI. Progress in physicochemical parameters of microalgae cultivation for biofuel production. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2019;39:835e859. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/07388551.2019.1624945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Hu Q. Industrial production of microalgal cell-mass and secondary products - major industrial species: Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis. In: Richmond A, editor. Microalgal culture: Biotechnology and applied phycology. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2004. p. 264–72.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Hu Z, Li Y, Sommerfeld M, Chen F, Hu Q. Enhanced protection against oxidative stress in an astaxanthin-overproduction Haematococcus mutant (Chlorophyceae). Eur J Phycol. 2008;43(4):365–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Hudson BJ, Karis IG. The lipids of the alga Spirulina. J Sci Food Agric. 1974;25(7):759–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Humaidah N, Nakai S, Nishijima W, Gotoh T, Furuta M. Application of Aurantiochytrium sp L3W for food-processing wastewater treatment in combination with polyunsaturated fatty acids production for fish aquaculture. Sci Total Environ. 2020;743:140735.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Ip PF, Chen F. Employment of reactive oxygen species to enhance astaxanthin formation in Chlorella zofingiensis in heterotrophic culture. Process Biochem. 2005;40(11):3491–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Jacob-Lopes E, Maroneze MM, Deprá MC, Sartori RB, Dias RR, Zepka LQ. Bioactive food compounds from microalgae: An innovative framework on industrial biorefineries. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2019;25:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Jaeschke DP, Teixeira IR, Marczak LDF, Mercali GD. Phycocyanin from Spirulina: A review of extraction methods and stability. Int Food Res. 2021;143:110314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Janknegt PJ, De Graaff CM, Van De Poll WH, Visser RJ, Helbling EW, Buma AG. Antioxidative responses of two marine microalgae during acclimation to static and fluctuating natural UV radiation. Photochem Photobiol. 2009;85(6):1336–45.

  97. Javed F, Rehman F, Khan AU, Fazal T, Hafeez A, Rashid N. Real textile industrial wastewater treatment and biodiesel production using microalgae. Biomass Bioenerg J. 2022;165:106559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Jena, J. and Subudhi, E., 2019. Microalgae: An untapped resource for natural antimicrobials. The role of microalgae in wastewater treatment, pp.99-114.

  99. Jeong BR, Jang J, Jin E. Genome engineering via gene editing technologies in microalgae. Bioresour Technol. 2023;373:128701.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Jha S, Singh R, Pandey BK, Tiwari AK, Shukla S, Dikshit A, Bhardwaj AK. Recent aspects of algal biomass for sustainable fuel production: a review. Discov Sustain. 2024;5(1):300.

  101. Ji MK, Abou-Shanab RA, Kim SH, Salama ES, Lee SH, Kabra AN, et al. Cultivation of microalgae species in tertiary municipal wastewater supplemented with CO2 for nutrient removal and biomass production. Ecol Eng. 2013;58:142–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Ji MK, Yun HS, Park S, Lee H, Park YT, Bae S, Ham J, Choi J. Effect of food wastewater on biomass production by a green microalga Scenedesmus obliquus for bioenergy generation. Bioresour Technol. 2015;179:624–8.

  103. Jiang HW, Ho MY. Isolation and characterization of intact phycobilisome in cyanobacteria. JoVE. 2021;177:e63272.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Jiang L, Pei H, Hu W, Ji Y, Han L, Ma G. The feasibility of using complex wastewater from a monosodium glutamate factory to cultivate Spirulina subsalsa and accumulate biochemical composition. Bioresour Technol. 2015;180:304–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Jiang J, Huang J, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Du Y, Cheng Z, Feng B, Yao T, Zhang A, Zhao Z. Potential integration of wastewater treatment and natural pigment production by Phaeodactylum tricornutum: Microalgal growth, nutrient removal, and fucoxanthin accumulation. J Appl Phycol. 2022;34(3):1411–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Jiao GJ, Ma J, Li Y, Jin D, Ali Z, Zhou J, Sun R. Recent advances and challenges on removal and recycling of phosphate from wastewater using biomass-derived adsorbents. Chemosphere. 2021;278:130377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Joel J. Global fucoxanthin market 2016 industry trends, sales, supply, demand, analysis and forecast to 2021. New York: Analysis and Forecast; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Kalantaryan NK, Harutyunyan BA, Minasyan EV, Tsaturyan AH, Pavlečić M, Marđetko N, Goginyan VB. Comparative Assessment of Brewery Wastewater Treatment Potential by Microalgae Parachlorella kessleri and Chlorella vulgaris. Biol J Armen. 2020;72(4):72–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Kalra R, Gaur S, Goel M. Microalgae bioremediation: A perspective towards wastewater treatment along with industrial carotenoids production. J Water Process Eng. 2021;40: 101794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Kang S, Kim KH, Chung N, Li Z. A new omega-3 rich euglenoid Eutreptiella sp. from the Korean coastal waters. Algal Res. 2023;75:103296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Kaushik BD. Developments in cyanobacterial biofertilizer. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. 2014;80(2):379–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Khan F, Malik S, Shahid A, Siddiqui AJ, Musharraf SG, Zhu H, Alkhattabi NA, Gull M, Mehmood MA. Characterization of a newly isolated cyanobacterium Trichocoleus desertorum BERC08 as a potential feedstock for the algal biorefinery. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2023;13(6):5283–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Klemenčič, M., Nielsen, A.Z., Sakuragi, Y., Frigaard, N.U., Čelešnik, H., Jensen, P.E. and Dolinar, M., 2017. Synthetic biology of cyanobacteria for production of biofuels and high-value products. In Microalgae-based biofuels and bioproducts (pp. 305-325). Woodhead Publishing.

  114. Kothari R, Prasad R, Kumar V, Singh DP. Production of biodiesel from microalgae Chlamydomonas polypyrenoideum grown on dairy industry wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2013;144:499–503.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Koyande AK, Show PL, Guo R, Tang B, Ogino C, Chang JS. Bio-processing of algal bio-refinery: a review on current advances and future perspectives. Bioengineered. 2019;10(1):574–92.

  116. Kumar BR, Deviram G, Mathimani T, Duc PA, Pugazhendhi A. Microalgae as rich source of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019;17:583–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Kumar BR, Mathimani T, Sudhakar MP, Rajendran K, Nizami AS, Brindhadevi K, Pugazhendhi A. A state of the art review on the cultivation of algae for energy and other valuable products: application, challenges, and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;138:110649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Kumar, M.S., Buttar, H.S., Dalal, Y. and Singh, R.B., 2022. Cardioprotective and neuroprotective effects of nutraceuticals derived from marine origin. In Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals in Metabolic and Non-Communicable Diseases (pp. 707-723). Academic Press.

  119. Kuo CM, Chen TY, Lin TH, Kao CY, Lai JT, Chang JS, Lin CS. Cultivation of Chlorella sp. GD using piggery wastewater for biomass and lipid production. Bioresour Technol. 2015;194:326–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Kusmayadi A, Huang CY, Leong YK, Yen HW, Lee DJ, Chang JS. Utilizing microalgal hydrolysate from dairy wastewater-grown Chlorella sorokiniana SU-1 as sustainable feedstock for polyhydroxybutyrate and β-carotene production by engineered Rhodotorula glutinis,# 100–29. Bioresour Technol. 2023;384:129277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Lam MK, Yusoff MI, Uemura Y, Lim JW, Khoo CG, Lee KT, Ong HC. Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris using nutrients source from domestic wastewater for biodiesel production: Growth condition and kinetic studies. Ren Ene. 2017;103:197–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Ledda C, Idà A, Allemand D, Mariani P, Adani F. Production of wild Chlorella sp. cultivated in digested and membrane-pretreated swine manure derived from a full-scale operation plant. Algal Res. 2015;12:68–73.

  123. Leite LDS, Daniel LA. Optimization of microalgae harvesting by sedimentation induced by high pH. Water Sci Technol. 2020;82(6):1227–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Levi C, Gibbs M. Starch degradation in synchronously grown Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and characterization of the amylase. Plant Physiol. 1984;74(3):459–63.

  125. Li W, Pu Y, Tang Z, Zhao F, Xie M, Qin S. Energy transfer dynamics in B-phycoerythrin from the red alga Porphyridium purpureum. Chin J Phys. 2020;66:24–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Li X, Wang X, Duan C, Yi S, Gao Z, Xiao C, Agathos SN, Wang G, Li J. Biotechnological production of astaxanthin from the microalga Haematococcus pluvialis. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;43:107602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Li X, Yang C, Zeng G, Wu S, Lin Y, Zhou Q, Lou W, Du C, Nie L, Zhong Y. Nutrient removal from swine wastewater with growing microalgae at various zinc concentrations. Algal Res. 2020;46:101804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Liang Y, Deng L, Feng Z, Ouyang Q, Wu X, Quan W, Zhu Y, Ye H, Wu K, Luo H. A chitosan-based flocculation method for efficient recovery of high-purity B-Phycoerythrin from a low concentration of phycobilin in wastewater. Molecules. 2023;28(8):3600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Liber JA, Bryson AE, Bonito G, Du ZY. Harvesting microalgae for food and energy products. Small Methods. 2020;4(10):2000349.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Ling J, Nip S, Cheok WL, de Toledo RA, Shim H. Lipid production by a mixed culture of oleaginous yeast and microalga from distillery and domestic mixed wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2014;173:132–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Liu J, Chen F. Biology and Industrial Applications of Chlorella: Advances and Prospects. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2016;153:1–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/10_2014_286. PMID: 25537445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Liu C, Hu B, Cheng Y, Guo Y, Yao W, Qian H. Carotenoids from fungi and microalgae: A review on their recent production, extraction and developments. Bioresour Technol. 2021;337:125398.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Lockau W, Peffer S, Naturforsch Z. 37c. 1988;(1982):658.

  134. Lu Q, Xiao Y. From manure to high-value fertilizer: The employment of microalgae as a nutrient carrier for sustainable agriculture. Algal Res. 2022;67:102855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Luo L, He H, Yang C, Wen S, Zeng G, Wu M, et al. Nutrient removal and lipid production by Coelastrella sp. in anaerobically and aerobically treated swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2016;216:135–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Ma C, Wen H, Xing D, Pei X, Zhu J, Ren N, Liu B. Molasses wastewater treatment and lipid production at low temperature conditions by a microalgal mutant Scenedesmus sp. Z-4. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Ma, J., Hu, J., Sha, X., Meng, D. and Yang, R. Phycobiliproteins, the pigment-protein complex form of natural food colorants and bioactive ingredients. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022:1-19.

  138. Madadi R, Maljaee H, Serafim LS, Ventura SP. Microalgae as contributors to produce biopolymers. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(8):466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Magro CD, Deon MC, Rossi AD, Reinehr CO, Hemkemeier M, Colla LM. Chromium (VI) biosorption and removal of chemical oxygen demand by Spirulina platensis from wastewater-supplemented culture medium. J Environ Sci Health Part A. 2012;47(12):1818–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV. Euglena sp. as a suitable source of lipids for potential use as biofuel and sustainable wastewater treatment. J Appl Phycol. 2013;25:855–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV. Bioremediation and lipid synthesis through mixotrophic algal consortia in municipal wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2014;168:142–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Maltsev Y, Maltseva K. Fatty acids of microalgae: Diversity and applications. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2021;20:515–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Mansour AT, Alprol AE, Abualnaja KM, El-Beltagi HS, Ramadan KM, Ashour M. The using of nanoparticles of microalgae in remediation of toxic dye from industrial wastewater: kinetic and isotherm studies. Materials. 2022;15(11):3922.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Markou G, Chatzipavlidis I, Georgakakis D. Cultivation of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis in olive-oil mill wastewater treated with sodium hypochlorite. Bioresour Technol. 2012;112:234–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Markou G, Angelidaki I, Nerantzis E, Georgakakis D. Bioethanol production by carbohydrate- enriched biomass of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis. Energies. 2013;6(8):3937–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Mastropetros SG, Pispas K, Zagklis D, Tsigkou K, Ali SS, Ariyadasa TU, Kornaros M. Effect of a dark-colored substrate on the production of phycocyanin by the cyanobacterium Phormidium sp. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023;11(5):110580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Matos ÂP. The impact of microalgae in food science and technology. J Am Oil Chem. 2017;94:1333–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Mehariya S, Plöhn M, Jablonski P, Stagge S, Jönsson LJ, Funk C. Biopolymer production from biomass produced by Nordic microalgae grown in wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2023;376:128901.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Michelon, W., da Silva, M.L.B., Matthiensen, A., de Andrade, C.J., de Andrade, L.M. and Soares, H.M., 2021. Amino acids, fatty acids and peptides in microalgae biomass harvested from phycoremediation of swine wastewaters. Biomass Convers. Biorefin., pp.1-12.

  150. Michelon W, Matthiensen A, Viancelli A, Fongaro G, Gressler V, Soares HM. Removal of veterinary antibiotics in swine wastewater using microalgae-based process. Environ Res. 2022;207:112192.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Minato T, Teramoto T, Adachi N, Hung NK, Yamada K, Kawasaki M, Akutsu M, Moriya T, Senda T, Ogo S, Kakuta Y. Non-conventional octameric structure of C-phycocyanin. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):1238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Mirzaei, M., Jazini, M., Aminiershad, G. and Refardt, D., 2024. Biodesalination of saline aquaculture wastewater with simultaneous nutrient removal and biomass production using the microalgae Arthrospira and Dunaliella in a circular economy approach. Desalination, p.117564.

  153. Mishra et al. Engine worthy fatty acid methyl ester (biodiesel) from naturally occurring marine microalgal mats and marine microalgae cultured in open salt pans together with value addition of co-products. 2012. EP2718453A2.2718453A2.

  154. Mishra S. 2024. The dietary benefits and potential of Spirulina. Council Of Scientific And Industrial Research–National Institute Of Science Communication and Policy Research (CSIR–NIScPR), New Delhi, India.

  155. Mishra SK, Shrivastav A, Mishra S. Effect of preservatives for food grade C-PC from Spirulina platensis. Process Biochem. 2008;43(4):339–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Misra HP, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: a photochemical augmentation assay. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1977;181(1):308–12.

  157. Mitra M, Shah F, Bharadwaj SV, Patidar SK, Mishra S. Cultivation of Nannochloropsis oceanica biomass rich in eicosapentaenoic acid utilizing wastewater as nutrient resource. Bioresour Technol. 2016;218:1178–86.

  158. Mitra M, Mishra S. Effect of glucose on growth and fatty acid composition of an euryhaline eustigmatophyte Nannochloropsis oceanica under mixotrophic culture condition. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2018;3:147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Mitra M, Mishra S. Multiproduct biorefinery from Arthrospira spp. towards zero waste: Current status and future trends. Bioresour Technol. 2019;291:121928.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Mohan SV, Devi MP. Salinity stress induced lipid synthesis to harness biodiesel during dual mode cultivation of mixotrophic microalgae. Bioresour Technol. 2014;165:288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Mokhtari E, Rafiei S, Shokri-Mashhadi N, Saneei P. Impact of astaxanthin supplementation on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Funct Foods. 2021;87:104860.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Morillas-España A, Lafarga T, Sánchez-Zurano A, Acién-Fernández FG, González-López C. Microalgae based wastewater treatment coupled to the production of high value agricultural products: Current needs and challenges. Chemosphere. 2022;291:132968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Moustafa ES, Alsanie WF, Gaber A, Kamel NN, Alaqil AA, Abbas AO. Blue-green algae (Spirulina platensis) alleviates the negative impact of heat stress on broiler production performance and redox status. Animals. 2021;11(5):1243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  164. Mühling M, Belay A, Whitton BA. Variation in fatty acid composition of Arthrospira (Spirulina) strains. J Appl Phycol. 2005;17:137–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Natasha, Shahid, M., Khalid, S., Murtaza, B., Anwar, H., Shah, A.H., Sardar, A., Shabbir, Z. and Niazi, N.K., 2020. A critical analysis of wastewater use in agriculture and associated health risks in Pakistan. Environ Geochem Health, pp.1-20.

  166. Nayak M, Karemore A, Sen R. Performance evaluation of microalgae for concomitant wastewater bioremediation, CO2 biofixation and lipid biosynthesis for biodiesel application. Algal Res. 2016;16:216–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Nayak M, Karemore A, Sen R. Sustainable valorization of flue gas CO 2 and wastewater for the production of microalgal biomass as a biofuel feedstock in closed and open reactor systems. RSC Adv. 2016;6:91111–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  168. Nehme R, Atieh C, Fayad S, Claude B, Chartier A, Tannoury M, Elleuch F, Abdelkafi S, Pichon C, Morin P. Microalgae amino acid extraction and analysis at nanomolar level using electroporation and capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Separ Sci. 2017;40:558e566. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jssc.201601005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Ng DH, Ng YK, Shen H, Lee YK. Microalgal biotechnology: The way forward. In: Handbook of marine microalgae. Academic Press; 2015. p. 69–80.

  170. Norton TA, Melkonian M, Andersen RA. Algal biodiversity. Phycologia. 1996;35:308–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Novoveská L, Ross ME, Stanley MS, Pradelles R, Wasiolek V, Sassi JF. Microalgal carotenoids: A review of production, current markets, regulations, and future direction. Mar Drugs. 2019;2019(17):640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Nowruzi B, Konur O, Anvar SAA. The stability of the phycobiliproteins in the adverse environmental conditions relevant to the food storage. Food Bioprocess Tech. 2022;15(12):2646–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Nzayisenga JC, Eriksson K, Sellstedt A. Mixotrophic and heterotrophic production of lipids and carbohydrates by a locally isolated microalga using wastewater as a growth medium. Bioresour Technol. 2018;257:260e265. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Oliveira EC, Osterlund K, Mtolera MSP. Marine Plants of Tanzania: A Field Guide to the Seaweeds and Seagrasses. Sweden: Botany Department, Stockholm University; 2005. p. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Osório, C., Machado, S., Peixoto, J., Bessada, S., Pimentel, F.B., C. Alves, R. and Oliveira, M.B.P. Pigments content (chlorophylls, fucoxanthin and phycobiliproteins) of different commercial dried algae. Separations. 2020;7(2):33.

  176. Oswald WJ, Gotaas HB, Golueke CG, Kellen WR, Gloyna EF, Hermann ER. Algae in waste treatment [with discussion]. Sewage Ind Waste. 1957;29(4):437–57.

  177. Otondo A, Kokabian B, Stuart-Dahl S, Gude VG. Energetic evaluation of wastewater treatment using microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris. J Environ Chem Eng. 2018;6(2):3213–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Otto B, Schlosser D, Reisser W. First description of a laccase-like enzyme in soil algae. Arch Microbiol. 2010;192:759–68.

  179. Padri M, Boontian N, Teaumroong N, Piromyou P, Piasai C. Application of Aspergillus niger F5 as an alternative technique to harvest microalgae and as a phosphorous removal treatment for cassava biogas effluent wastewater. J Water Process Eng. 2022;46:102524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Pal P, Chew KW, Yen HW, Lim JW, Lam MK, Show PL. Cultivation of oily microalgae for the production of third-generation biofuels. Sustainability. 2019;11(19):5424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. Paliwal C, Ghosh T, Bhayani K, Maurya R, Mishra S. Antioxidant, anti-nephrolithe activities and in vitro digestibility studies of three different cyanobacterial pigment extracts. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(8):5384–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. Pan M, Zhu X, Pan G, Angelidak I. Integrated valorization system for simultaneous high strength organic wastewater treatment and astaxanthin production from Haematococcus pluvialis. Bioresour Technol. 2021;326:124761.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. Pancha I, Chokshi K, George B, Ghosh T, Paliwal C, Maurya R, Mishra S. Nitrogen stress triggered biochemical and morphological changes in the microalgae Scenedesmus sp. CCNM 1077. Bioresour Technol. 2014;156:146–54.

  184. Pancha I, Chokshi K, Ghosh T, Paliwal C, Maurya R, Mishra S. Bicarbonate supplementation enhanced biofuel production potential as well as nutritional stress mitigation in the microalgae Scenedesmus sp. CCNM 1077. Bioresour Technol. 2015;193:315–23.

  185. Pancha I, Chokshi K, Mishra S. Industrial wastewater-based microalgal biorefinery: A dual strategy to remediate waste and produce microalgal bioproducts. Application of Microalgae in Wastewater Treatment, vol. 2. Biorefinery Approaches of Wastewater Treatment; 2019. p. 173–193.

  186. Panda B, Sharma L, Mallick N. Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate accumulation in Nostoc muscorum and Spirulina platensis under phosphate limitation. J Plant Physiol. 2005;162:1376–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. Pandey A, Srivastava S, Kumar S. Scenedesmus sp. ASK22 cultivation using simulated dairy wastewater for nutrient sequestration and biofuel production: insight into fuel properties and their blends. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2024;14(3):3305–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. Park YK and Lee J. Achievements in the production of bioplastics from microalgae. Phytochem Rev. 2022:1-19.

  189. Paswan MB, Chudasama MM, Mitra M, Bhayani K, George B, Chatterjee S, Mishra S. Fluorescence quenching property of C-phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis and its binding efficacy with viable cell components. J Fluoresc. 2016;26(2):577–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. Patel A, Mishra S, Pawar R, Ghosh PK. Purification and characterization of C-Phycocyanin from cyanobacterial species of marine and freshwater habitat. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;40(2):248–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. Patel A, Zhu J, Nakhla G. Simultaneous carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous removal from municipal wastewater in a circulating fluidized bed bioreactor. Chemosphere. 2006;65(7):1103–12.

  192. Patel AK, Tambat VS, Chen CW, Chauhan AS, Kumar P, Vadrale AP, Huang CY, Dong CD, Singhania RR. Recent advancements in astaxanthin production from microalgae: A review. Bioresour Technol. 2022;364:128030.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Paulenco A, Vintila ACN, Vlaicu A, Ciltea-Udrescu M, Galan AM. Nannochloropsris sp. Microalgae Strain for Treatment of Dairy Wastewaters. Microorganisms. 2023;11(6):1469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. Peng L, Fu D, Chu H, Wang Z, Qi H. Biofuel production from microalgae: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2020;18:285–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. Phang SM, Miah MS, Yeoh BG, Hashim MA. Spirulina cultivation in digested sago starch factory waste water. J Appl Phycol. 2000;12(3):395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Pocha CKR, Chia WY, Chew KW, Munawaroh HSH, Show PL. Current advances in recovery and biorefinery of fucoxanthin from Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Algal Res. 2022;65:102735.

  197. Prabakaran G, Moovendhan M, Arumugam A, Matharasi A, Dineshkumar R, Sampathkumar P. Evaluation of chemical composition and in vitro anti-inflammatory effect of marine microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Waste and Biomass Valori. 2019;10:3263–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. Prasanna R, Nain L, Tripathi R, Gupta V, Chaudhary V, Middha S, Joshi M, Ancha R, Kaushik BD. Evaluation of fungicidal activity of extracellular filtrates of cyanobacteria–possible role of hydrolytic enzymes. J Basic Microbiol. 2008;48(3):186–94.

  199. Premaratne M, Nishshanka GKSH, Anthonio RADP, Liyanaarachchi VC, Thevarajah B, Nimarshana PHV, Malik A, Ariyadasa TU. Resource recovery from waste streams for production of microalgae biomass: A sustainable approach towards high-value biorefineries. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2022;18:101070.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. Qiu Y, Zu Y, Song C, Xie M, Qi Y, Kansha Y, Kitamura Y. Soybean processing wastewater purification via Chlorella L166 and L38 with potential value-added ingredients production. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  201. Qv M, Dai D, Liu D, Wu Q, Tang C, Li S, Zhu L. Towards advanced nutrient removal by microalgae-bacteria symbiosis system for wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2023;370:128574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  202. Rahman, K.M., 2020. Food and high value products from microalgae: market opportunities and challenges. Microalgae biotechnology for food, health and high value products, pp.3-27.

  203. Rahman MM, Hosano N, Hosano H. Recovering microalgal bioresources: A review of cell disruption methods and extraction technologies. Molecules. 2022;27(9):2786.

  204. Rajapitamahuni S, Bachani P, Sardar RK, Mishra S. Co-cultivation of siderophore-producing bacteria Idiomarina loihiensis RS14 with Chlorella variabilis ATCC 12198, evaluation of micro-algal growth, lipid, and protein content under iron starvation. J Appl Phycol. 2019;31:29–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  205. Ram S, Tirkey SR, Bharadwaj VS, Ghosh A, Mishra S. Utilization of Leptolyngbya boryana mat for modulating nutrient uptake and its translocation in rice (Oryza sativa). Bioresour Technol Rep. 2020;12:100575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Ramadan MF, Selim aSkeR, M. M. Functional bioactive compounds and biological activities. Czech J Food Sci. 2008;26(3):211–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  207. Randhir A, Laird DW, Maker G, Trengove R, Moheimani NR. Microalgae: a potential sustainable commercial source of sterols. Algal Res. 2020;46:101772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Rao AV, Rao LG. Carotenoids and human health. Pharmacol Res. 2007;55(3):207–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  209. Remize M, Brunel Y, Silva JL, Berthon JY, Filaire E. Microalgae n-3 PUFAs production and use in food and feed industries. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(2):113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  210. Ren Y, Sun H, Deng J, Huang J, Chen F. Carotenoid production from microalgae: biosynthesis, salinity responses and novel biotechnologies. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(12):713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  211. Renuka N, Guldhe A, Prasanna R, Singh P, Bux F. Microalgae as multi functional options in modern agriculture: Current trends, prospects and challenges. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36:1255–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  212. Reynolds D, Huesemann M, Edmundson S, Sims A, Hurst B, Cady S, Beirne N, Freeman J, Berger A, Gao S. Viral inhibitors derived from macroalgae, microalgae, and cyanobacteria: A review of antiviral potential throughout pathogenesis. Algal Res. 2021;57:102331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  213. Riaz, M., Zia-Ul-Haq, M. and Dou, D., 2021. Chemistry of carotenoids. Carotenoids: Structure and Function in the Human Body, pp.43-76.

  214. Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B. and Maldonade, I.R., 2019. Potentials and challenges in the production of microalgal pigments with reference to carotenoids, chlorophylls, and phycobiliproteins. In Handbook of Algal Technologies and Phytochemicals (pp. 111-120). CRC Press.

  215. Sabapathy PC, Devaraj S, Meixner K, Anburajan P, Kathirvel P, Ravikumar Y, Zabed HM, Qi X. Recent developments in Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) production–A review. Bioresour Technol. 2020;306:123132.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  216. Saccà SC, Cutolo CA, Ferrari D, Corazza P, Traverso CE. The eye, oxidative damage and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):668.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  217. Sadukha S, Bhayani A, Padariya H, Vaghela P, Mishra S, Ghosh A, Dineshkumar R. Performance evaluation of microalgal strains for concurrent production of high-value bio-actives lutein and phytol: A step forward towards the multi-product paradigm. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2023:50:102737.

  218. Safafar H, Van Wagenen J, Møller P, Jacobsen C. Carotenoids, phenolic compounds and tocopherols contribute to the antioxidative properties of some microalgae species grown on industrial wastewater. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(12):7339–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  219. Saha SK, Moane S, Murray P. Effect of macro-and micro-nutrient limitation on superoxide dismutase activities and carotenoid levels in microalga Dunaliella salina CCAP 19/18. Bioresour Technol. 2013;147:23–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  220. Sahu A, Pancha I, Jain D, Paliwal C, Ghosh T, Patidar S, Bhattacharya S, Mishra S. Fatty acids as biomarkers of microalgae. Phytochemistry. 2013;89:53–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 28 PMID: 23453131.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  221. Sajilata MG, Singhal RS, Kamat MY. The carotenoid pigment zeaxanthin—a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2008;7(1):29–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  222. Salla ACV, Margarites AC, Seibel FI, Holz LC, Brião VB, Bertolin TE, Costa JAV. Increase in the carbohydrate content of the microalgae Spirulina in culture by nutrient starvation and the addition of residues of whey protein concentrate. Bioresour Technol. 2016;209:133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  223. Schmatz DA, da Silva Uebel L, Kuntzler SG, Dora CL, Vieira Costa JA, de Morais MG. Scaffolds containing Spirulina sp. LEB 18 biomass: development, characterization and evaluation of in vitro biodegradation. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2016;16(1):1050–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  224. Selvan ST, Chandrasekaran R, Muthusamy S, Ramamurthy D. Eco-friendly approach for tannery effluent treatment and CO2 sequestration using unicellular green oleaginous microalga Tetradesmus obliquus TS03. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(16):48138–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  225. Shaish A, Avron M, Pick U, Ben-Amotz A. Are active oxygen species involved in induction of β-carotene in Dunaliella bardawil? Planta. 1993;190:363–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  226. Shalaby SM, Madkour FF, El-Kassas HY, Mohamed AA, Elgarahy AM. Green synthesis of recyclable iron oxide nanoparticles using Spirulina platensis microalgae for adsorptive removal of cationic and anionic dyes. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:65549–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  227. Sharma NK, Tiwari SP, Tripathi K, Rai AK. Sustainability and cyanobacteria (blue-green algae): facts and challenges. J Appl Phycol. 2011;23(6):1059–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  228. Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(20):22–33.

  229. Shen MY, Chu CY, Sawatdeenarunat C, Bhuyar P. Production, downstream processing, and characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) boosted by pyruvate supplement using mixed microbial culture (MMC) and organic wastewater. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2023;13(17):15861–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  230. Shin DY, Cho HU, Utomo JC, Choi YN, Xu X, Park JM. Biodiesel production from Scenedesmus bijuga grown in anaerobically digested food wastewater effluent. Bioresour Technol. 2015;184:215–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  231. Shrivastav A, Mishra SK, Pancha I, Jain D, Bhattacharya S, Patel S, Mishra S. Biodegradability studies of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) film produced by a marine bacteria using Jatropha biodiesel byproduct as a substrate. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27:1531–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  232. Siddiki SYA, Mofijur M, Kumar PS, Ahmed SF, Inayat A, Kusumo F, Badruddin IA, Khan TY, Nghiem LD, Ong HC, Mahlia TMI. Microalgae biomass as a sustainable source for biofuel, biochemical and biobased value-added products: An integrated biorefinery concept. Fuel. 2022;307:121782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  233. Silva SC, Ferreira IC, Dias MM, Barreiro MF. Microalgae-derived pigments: A 10-year bibliometric review and industry and market trend analysis. Molecules. 2020;25(15):3406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  234. Singh, P.K., Marella, T.K., Bhattacharjya, R., Tyagi, R., Plaha, N.S., Kaushik, N. and Tiwari, A., 2024. Marine diatom algae cultivation in simulated dairy wastewater and biomass valorization. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, pp.1-12.

  235. Soydemir G, Keris-Sen UD, Sen U, Gurol MD. Biodiesel production potential of mixed microalgal culture grown in domestic wastewater. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2016;39:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  236. Strohmeier U, Gerdes C, Lockau W. Proteolysis in heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria: characterization of a further enzyme with trypsin-like specificity, and of a prolyl endopeptidase from Anabaena variabilis. Z Naturforsch C. 1994;49(1-2):70–8.

  237. Su Y. Revisiting carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus metabolisms in microalgae for wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2021;762:144590.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  238. Su Y, Zhu X, Zou R, Zhang Y. The interactions between microalgae and wastewater indigenous bacteria for treatment and valorization of brewery wastewater. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2022;182:106341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  239. Subramanian G, Sekar S, Sampoornam S. Biodegradation and utilization of organophosphorus pesticides by cyanobacteria. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 1994;33(2):129–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  240. Sun J, Norouzi O, Mašek O. A state-of-the-art review on algae pyrolysis for bioenergy and biochar production. Bioresour Technol. 2022;346:126258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  241. Taguchi S, Matsumoto KI. Evolution of polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesizing systems toward a sustainable plastic industry. Polym J. 2021;53(1):67–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  242. Tan, K.M., Kassim, M.A., Ng, Z.J., Lalung, J., 2020. Isolation and characterization of novel acidophilic microalgae from abandoned mining site area for carbohydrate biosynthesis and its kinetic growth study in photobioreactor, 012011 IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 716. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1088/1757e1899X/716/1/012011.

  243. Tandon P, Jin Q. Microalgae culture enhancement through key microbial approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;80:1089–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  244. Tang G, Suter PM. Vitamin A, nutrition, and health values of algae: Spirulina, Chlorella, and Dunaliella. JPANS. 2011;1(2):111–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  245. Tang DYY, Khoo KS, Chew KW, Tao Y, Ho SH, Show PL. Potential utilization of bioproducts from microalgae for the quality enhancement of natural products. Bioresour Technol. 2020;304:122997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  246. Teng CS, Xue C, Lin JY, Ng IS. Towards high-level protein, beta-carotene, and lutein production from Chlorella sorokiniana using aminobutyric acid and pseudo seawater. Biochem Eng J. 2022;184:108473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  247. Tibbetts SM, Milley JE, Lall SP. Chemical composition and nutritional properties of freshwater and marine microalgal biomass cultured in photobioreactors. J Appl Phycol. 2015;27:1109e1119. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10811-014-0428-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  248. Tocher DR, Betancor MB, Sprague M, Olsen RE, Napier JA. Omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, EPA and DHA: Bridging the gap between supply and demand. Nutrients. 2019;11(1):89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  249. Tossavainen M, Lahti K, Edelmann M, Eskola R, Lampi AM, Piironen V, Korvonen P, Ojala A, Romantschuk M. Integrated utilization of microalgae cultured in aquaculture wastewater: Wastewater treatment and production of valuable fatty acids and tocopherols. J Appl Phycol. 2019;31:1753–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  250. Tounsi L, Ben Hlima H, Hentati F, Hentati O, Derbel H, Michaud P, Abdelkafi S. Microalgae: a promising source of bioactive phycobiliproteins. Mar Drugs. 2023;21(8):440.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  251. Tripathi R, Gupta A, Thakur IS. An integrated approach for phycoremediation of wastewater and sustainable biodiesel production by green microalgae, Scenedesmus sp. ISTGA1. Renew Energy. 2019;135:617–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  252. Ummalyma SB, Chiang A, Herojit N, Arumugam M. Sustainable microalgal cultivation in poultry slaughterhouse wastewater for biorefinery products and pollutant removal. Bioresour Technol. 2023;374:128790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  253. Venckus P, Cicchi B, Chini Zittelli G. Effects of medium salinity on growth and biochemical composition of the green microalga Tetraselmis suecica. J Appl Phycol. 2021;33:3555–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  254. Venil, C.K., Yaamini, M. and Dufossé, L., 2023. Microalgae: A Valuable Source of Natural Colorants for Commercial Applications. In Microalgal Biotechnology (pp. 121-147). Apple Academic Press.

  255. Wang J, Hu X, Chen J, Wang T, Huang X, Chen G. The extraction of β-carotene from microalgae for testing their health benefits. Foods. 2022;11(4):502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  256. Wang S, Wu S, Yang G, Pan K, Wang L, Hu Z. A review on the progress, challenges and prospects in commercializing microalgal fucoxanthin. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;53:107865.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  257. Wang S, Yin C, Yang Z, Hu X, Liu Z, Song W. Assessing the potential of Chlorella sp. for treatment and resource utilization of brewery wastewater coupled with bioproduct production. J Clean Prod. 2022;367:132939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  258. Wei D, Chen F, Chen G, Zhang X, Liu L, Zhang H. Enhanced production of lutein in heterotrophic Chlorella protothecoides by oxidative stress. Sci China Life Sci. 2008;51:1088–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  259. Wu G. Functional amino acids in growth. Adv Nutr. 2010;1:31e37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3945/an.110.1008.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  260. Xia D, Liu B, Xin W, Liu T, Sun J, Liu N, Du Z. Protective effects of C-phycocyanin on alcohol-induced subacute liver injury in mice. J Appl Phycol. 2016;28(2):765–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  261. Xu, W., Wang, Z., Lu, B., Guo, G., Zhao, C., Liu, J. and Zhao, Y., 2024. Effect of different microalgae-bacterium-fungus symbiont technologies on nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater and biogas upgrading under a variety of mixed light wavelengths. Algal Res., p.103486.

  262. Zeller MA, Hunt R, Jones A, Sharma S. Bioplastics and their thermoplastic blends from Spirulina and Chlorella microalgae. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;130(5):3263–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  263. Zhang Y, Su H, Zhong Y, Zhang C, Shen Z, Sang W, Yan G, Zhou X. The effect of bacterial contamination on the heterotrophic cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa in wastewater from the production of soybean products. Water Res. 2012;46(17):5509–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  264. Zhang TY, Wu YH, Zhu SF, Li FM, Hu HY. Isolation and heterotrophic cultivation of mixo- trophic microalgae strains for domestic wastewater treatment and lipid production under dark condition. Bioresour Technol. 2013;149:586–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  265. Zhang J, Liu L, Ren Y, Chen F. Characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by microalgae with antitumor activity on human colon cancer cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;128:761–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  266. Zhang D, Sial MS, Ahmad N, Filipe AJ, Thu PA, Zia-Ud-Din M, Caleiro AB. Water scarcity and sustainability in an emerging economy: a management perspective for future. Sustainability. 2020;13(1):144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  267. Zhu L, Wang Z, Shu Q, Takala J, Hiltunen E, Feng P, Yuan Z. Nutrient removal and bio- diesel production by integration of freshwater algae cultivation with piggery wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2013;47:4294–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was available for the present work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RG- Methodology, Writing Original Draft, Figures & Tables, Editing & Finalization; NM- Methodology, Writing Original Draft, Editing, Finalization; GS – Editing & Finalization; SM-Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing Original Draft, Editing, Finalization, NL- Editing & Finalization. RG and NM contributed equally and should be considered as first authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Niranjan Mishra or Sandhya Mishra.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No studies on animal/human has been done, so the ethical approval is not required.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, R., Mishra, N., Singh, G. et al. Microalgae cultivation and value-based products from wastewater: insights and applications. Blue Biotechnology 1, 20 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s44315-024-00019-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s44315-024-00019-1

Keywords